Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35914220›Full record

ArticleBlood2022

Cost-effectiveness of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Swetha Kambhampati Thiruvengadam, Monica Saumoy, Yecheskel Schneider, Steve Serrao, Pejman Solaimani, Lihua Elizabeth Budde, Matthew G Mei, Leslie L Popplewell, Tanya Siddiqi, Jasmine Zain and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cellular therapy: Great promise, but at what cost?Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Swetha Kambhampati ThiruvengadamDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Monica SaumoyCenter for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, NJ.
Yecheskel SchneiderSt. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA.
Steve SerraoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA.
Pejman SolaimaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA.
Lihua Elizabeth BuddeDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-5494
Matthew G MeiDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Leslie L PopplewellDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-2811
Tanya SiddiqiDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-8298
Jasmine ZainDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Stephen J FormanDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Larry W KwakDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Steven T RosenDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Alexey V DanilovDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Alex F HerreraDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9665-7415
Nikhil R ThiruvengadamDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USLoma Linda University · USSt. Luke's University Health Network · USUniversity Medical Center of Princeton · US

Funding

Transplant for Lymphoma:Therapy-Related LeukemiaP50CA107399 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FORMAN, STEPHEN J, KWAK, LARRY W · 2004 to 2022
$35.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA107399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ZUMA-7 (Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma) study showed that axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) improved event-free survival (EFS) compared with standard of care (SOC) salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory/early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); this led to its recent US Food and Drug Administration approval in this setting. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with primary refractory/early relapsed DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of second-line axi-cel compared with SOC using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. EFS and OS were estimated from ZUMA-7. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year EFS of 35% with second-line axi-cel and 10% with SOC, axi-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY ($93 547 per QALY). axi-cel was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year EFS was ≤26.4% or if it cost more than $972 061 at a WTP of $150 000. Second-line axi-cel was the cost-effective strategy in 73% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in EFS is maintained over time, second-line axi-cel for aggressive relapsed/refractory DLBCL is cost-effective compared with SOC at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on long-term outcomes. Routine use of second-line chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy would add significantly to health care expenditures in the United States (more than $1 billion each year), even when used in a high-risk subpopulation. Further reductions in the cost of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are needed to be affordable in many regions of the world.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAgedAntigens, CD19Biological ProductsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveUnited StatesAntigens, CD19axicabtagene ciloleucelBiological ProductsReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35914220
PMCPMC9837443
OpenAlexW4289277826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.