Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35914185›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.

Luke Kemp, Chi Xu, Joanna Depledge, Kristie L Ebi, Goodwin Gibbins, Timothy A Kohler, Johan Rockström, Marten Scheffer, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Will Steffen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
76.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 735 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ambient heat and early childhood development: a cross-national analysis.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Globally Critical Infrastructure: The Unique Risks and Challenges.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Carbon footprint of Pars plana vitrectomies in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Germany between 2013 and 2023 - A cohort study of fluorinated gas emissions.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Luke KempCentre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1SB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-4335
Chi XuSchool of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-9032
Joanna DepledgeCambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom.
Kristie L EbiCenter for Health and the Global Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-8236
Goodwin GibbinsFuture of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 0DJ, United Kingdom.
Timothy A KohlerDepartment of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4910.ORCID 0000-0002-3414-6660
Johan RockströmPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
Marten SchefferDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Wageningen, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2100-0312
Hans Joachim SchellnhuberPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7453-4935
Will SteffenFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1163-6736
Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-7498
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBAustralian National University · AUNanjing University · CNSanta Fe Institute · USUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Washington · USWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prudent risk management requires consideration of bad-to-worst-case scenarios. Yet, for climate change, such potential futures are poorly understood. Could anthropogenic climate change result in worldwide societal collapse or even eventual human extinction? At present, this is a dangerously underexplored topic. Yet there are ample reasons to suspect that climate change could result in a global catastrophe. Analyzing the mechanisms for these extreme consequences could help galvanize action, improve resilience, and inform policy, including emergency responses. We outline current knowledge about the likelihood of extreme climate change, discuss why understanding bad-to-worst cases is vital, articulate reasons for concern about catastrophic outcomes, define key terms, and put forward a research agenda. The proposed agenda covers four main questions: 1) What is the potential for climate change to drive mass extinction events? 2) What are the mechanisms that could result in human mass mortality and morbidity? 3) What are human societies' vulnerabilities to climate-triggered risk cascades, such as from conflict, political instability, and systemic financial risk? 4) How can these multiple strands of evidence-together with other global dangers-be usefully synthesized into an "integrated catastrophe assessment"? It is time for the scientific community to grapple with the challenge of better understanding catastrophic climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDisaster PlanningRisk ManagementForecastingHumansAnthropocenecatastrophic climate changeclimate changeEarth system trajectoriestipping elements

Identifiers

PMID35914185
PMCPMC9407216
OpenAlexW4289262061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.