Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Analysis of mobility level of COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation support: A single center, retrospective cohort study.

Ricardo Kenji Nawa, Ary Serpa Neto, Ana Carolina Lazarin, Ana Kelen da Silva, Camila Nascimento, Thais Dias Midega, Raquel Afonso Caserta Eid, Thiago Domingos Corrêa, Karina Tavares Timenetsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Kenji NawaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0852-7013
Ary Serpa NetoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Carolina LazarinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Kelen da SilvaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Camila NascimentoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thais Dias MidegaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Raquel Afonso Caserta EidDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thiago Domingos CorrêaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Karina Tavares TimenetskyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients frequently require mechanical ventilation (MV) and undergo prolonged periods of bed rest with restriction of activities during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Our aim was to address the degree of mobilization in critically ill patients with COVID-19 undergoing to MV support.

methodsRetrospective single-center cohort study. We analyzed patients' mobility level, through the Perme ICU Mobility Score (Perme Score) of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. The Perme Mobility Index (PMI) was calculated [PMI = ΔPerme Score (ICU discharge-ICU admission)/ICU length of stay], and patients were categorized as "improved" (PMI > 0) or "not improved" (PMI ≤ 0). Comparisons were performed with stratification according to the use of MV support.

resultsFrom February 2020, to February 2021, 1,297 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU and assessed for eligibility. Out of those, 949 patients were included in the study [524 (55.2%) were classified as "improved" and 425 (44.8%) as "not improved"], and 396 (41.7%) received MV during ICU stay. The overall rate of patients out of bed and able to walk ≥ 30 meters at ICU discharge were, respectively, 526 (63.3%) and 170 (20.5%). After adjusting for confounders, independent predictors of improvement of mobility level were frailty (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-0.94; p = 0.03); SAPS III Score (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99; p = 0.04); SOFA Score (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43-0.78; p < 0.001); use of MV after the first hour of ICU admission (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.99; p = 0.04); tracheostomy (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.30-0.95; p = 0.03); use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.05-0.8; p = 0.03); neuromuscular blockade (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3-0.95; p = 0.03); a higher Perme Score at admission (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.28-0.43; p < 0.001); palliative care (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.16; p < 0.001); and a longer ICU stay (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; p = 0.04) were associated with a lower chance of mobility improvement, while non-invasive ventilation within the first hour of ICU admission and after the first hour of ICU admission (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.59-3.81; p < 0.001) and (OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.56-3.26; p < 0.001), respectively; and vasopressor use (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.07-5.5; p = 0.03) were associated with a higher chance of mobility improvement.

conclusionThe use of MV reduced mobility status in less than half of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiration, ArtificialCohort StudiesCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35913973
PMCPMC9342786
OpenAlexW4289262433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.