Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Experimental cross-contamination of chicken salad with Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and London during food preparation in Cambodian households.

Rortana Chea, Hung Nguyen-Viet, Sothyra Tum, Fred Unger, Johanna Lindahl, Delia Grace, Chhay Ty, Sok Koam, Vor Sina, Huy Sokchea and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rortana CheaNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-6398
Hung Nguyen-VietInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sothyra TumNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Fred UngerInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Johanna LindahlInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Delia GraceInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Chhay TyLivestock Development for Community Livelihood Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sok KoamNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Vor SinaLivestock Development for Community Livelihood Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Huy SokcheaLivestock Development for Community Livelihood Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Son PovLivestock Development for Community Livelihood Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Theng HengNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Or PhirumNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sinh Dang-XuanInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Livestock Research Institute · KEHanoi School Of Public Health · VNNatural Resources Institute · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-typhoidal Salmonellae are common foodborne pathogens that can cause gastroenteritis and other illnesses in people. This is the first study to assess the transfer of Salmonella enterica from raw chicken carcasses to ready-to-eat chicken salad in Cambodia. Twelve focus group discussions in four Cambodian provinces collected information on typical household ways of preparing salad. The results informed four laboratory experiments that mimicked household practices, using chicken carcasses inoculated with Salmonella. We developed four scenarios encompassing the range of practices, varying by order of washing (chicken or vegetables first) and change of chopping utensils (same utensils or different). Even though raw carcasses were washed twice, Salmonella was isolated from 32 out of 36 chicken samples (88.9%, 95% CI: 73.0-96.4) and two out of 18 vegetable samples (11.1%, 95% CI: 1.9-36.1). Salmonella was detected on cutting boards (66.7%), knives (50.0%) and hands (22.2%) after one wash; cross-contamination was significantly higher on cutting boards than on knives or hands (p-value < 0.05). The ready-to-eat chicken salad was contaminated in scenario 1 (wash vegetables first, use same utensils), 2 (wash vegetables first, use different utensils) and 3 (wash chicken first, use same utensils) but not 4 (wash chicken first, use different utensils) (77.8%, 11.1%, 22.2% and 0%, respectively). There was significantly higher Salmonella cross-contamination in scenario 1 (wash vegetables first, use same utensils) than in the other three scenarios. These results show how different hygiene practices influence the risk of pathogens contaminating chicken salad. This information could decrease the risk of foodborne disease in Cambodia and provides inputs to a quantitative risk assessment model.

Indexed as

SaladsSalmonella entericaAnimalsAsian PeopleChickensColony Count, MicrobialFood ContaminationFood HandlingFood MicrobiologyHumansLondonSalmonella typhimuriumSerogroupVegetables

Identifiers

PMID35913927
PMCPMC9342772
OpenAlexW4289261944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.