Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913678›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2022

FDG PET/CT in Cardiac Infection: Does It Matter? A Narrative Review.

Nesrin Ghanem-Zoubi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Innovations in Imaging:Current cardiology reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nesrin Ghanem-ZoubiInfectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Ha-Aliya 8 St, 3109601, Haifa, Israel. n_ghanem@rambam.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-3838
Rambam Health Care Campus · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited performance of echocardiography in specific infectious processes involving the heart led to the search for additional diagnostic tools. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) has been proposed for its diagnostic abilities in several infectious diseases including cardiac infections. A literature review of studies evaluating FDG PET/CT in native valve infective endocarditis (IE), prosthetic valve IE, cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) infection, and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infection is presented, focusing on studies published in recent years. Overall, in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), FDG PET/CT demonstrate high sensitivity (73-93%) and specificity (80-95%), while in native valve endocarditis (NVE) the sensitivity is very low (22-68%), with high specificity (97-100%) similar to PVE. For CIED, LVAD infection, and transcatheter aortic valve implantation associated endocarditis, data come from small studies and show good diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT. International guidelines are increasingly recommending FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of specific conditions of cardiac infections. Beyond the diagnostic performance ability, few studies have evaluated the added benefit of FDG PET/CT in terms of clinical outcomes of patients with suspected cardiac infection. This should be the focus in future studies.

Indexed as

Cardiac implantable electrical deviceFDG PET/CTFluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomographyInfective endocarditisLeft ventricular assist device

Identifiers

PMID35913678
PMCPMC9617977
OpenAlexW4289204827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.