Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913669›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Analysis of the Understanding and Worry about Lymphedema of Patients with Breast Cancer.

Rebecca A Uhlmann, Sarah L Mott, Melissa Curry, Sneha Phadke, Sonia L Sugg, Lillian M Erdahl, Ronald J Weigel, Ingrid M Lizarraga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Based on the health belief model: a qualitative exploration of factors influencing early screening behavior for breast cancer-related lymphedema.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca A UhlmannDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sarah L MottHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Melissa CurryHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sneha PhadkeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sonia L SuggDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Lillian M ErdahlDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ronald J WeigelDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ingrid M LizarragaDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA. Ingrid-Lizarraga@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphedema is a potential lifelong sequela of breast cancer treatment. We sought to: (1) evaluate the worry and knowledge of patients about lymphedema, (2) quantify patients reporting lymphedema education and screening, and (3) determine willingness to participate in lymphedema screening and prevention programs. PATIENTS AND

methodsA survey evaluating lymphedema-related knowledge and worry was sent to patients treated for stage 0-III breast cancer. Exclusion criteria included > 10 years since diagnosis, missing clinical staging, and those without axillary surgery. Responses were linked with clinicopathologic information.

resultsOf 141 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 89% of those without lymphedema were not at all or slightly worried about lymphedema. Higher levels of worry were associated with clinical stage II-III disease [odds ratio (OR) 2.63, p = 0.03], a history of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (OR 4.58, p < 0.01), and employment (OR 2.21, p = 0.05). A total of 102 (72%) patients recalled receiving lymphedema education. Lymphedema knowledge was limited, with < 25% of respondents answering > 50% of the risk factor questions correctly. Worry and knowledge were not significantly associated. Of patients without lymphedema, 36% were interested in learning more about lymphedema and 64% were willing to participate in or learn more about a screening program. Most (66%) felt that lymphedema information should be provided before and after cancer treatment. DISCUSSION: A majority of our breast cancer survivors had limited knowledge about lymphedema risk factors. While most patients were not worried about developing lymphedema, higher worry was seen in patients with a higher clinical stage at diagnosis, ALND, and employment. Our findings suggest potential targets and timing for patient-centered educational interventions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphedemaAxillaFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35913669
OpenAlexW4289333711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.