ArticleFolia microbiologica2023
Effects of multiple halotolerant rhizobacteria on the tolerance, growth, and yield of rice plants under salt stress.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitigation of Salt Stress in Rice by the Halotolerant Plant Growth-Promoting BacteriumJournal of xenobiotics · 2024Article
- Coping with salt stress-interaction of halotolerant bacteria in crop plants: A mini review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Paired growth of cultivated and halophytic wild rice under salt stress induces bacterial endophytes and gene expression responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Halotolerant bacteria get adapted to a saline environment through modified physiological/structural characteristics and may provide stress tolerance along with enhanced growth to the host plants by different direct and indirect mechanisms. This study reports on multiple halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from the coastal soils in Bangladesh, in fields where the halophytic wild rice Oryza coarctata is endemic. The aim was to find halotolerant bacteria for potential use as biofertilizer under normal/salt-stressed conditions. In this study, eight different strains were selected from a total of 20 rhizobacterial isolates from the saline-prone regions of Debhata and Satkhira based on their higher salt tolerance. 16S rRNA gene sequencing results of the rhizobacterial strains revealed that they belonged to Halobacillus, Bacillus, Acinetobactor, and Enterobactor genera. A total of ten halotolerant rhizobacteria (the other 2 bacteria were previously isolated and already reported as beneficial for rice growth) were used as both single inoculants and in combinations and applied to rice growing in pots. To investigate their capability to improve rice growth, physiological parameters such as shoot and root length and weight, chlorophyll content at the seedling stage as well as survival and yield at the reproductive stage were measured in the absence or presence (in concentration 40 or 80 mmol/L) of NaCl and in the absence or presence of the rhizobacteria. At the reproductive stage, only 50% of the uninoculated plants survived without setting any grains in 80 mmol/L NaCl in contrast to 100% survival of the rice plants inoculated with a combination of the rhizobacteria. The combined halotolerant rhizobacterial inoculations showed significantly higher chlorophyll retention as well as yield under the maximum NaCl concentration applied compared to application of single species. Thus, the use of a combination of halotolerant rhizobacteria as bioinoculants for rice plants under moderate salinity can synergistically alleviate the effects of stress and promote rice growth and yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.