Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913621›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base.

J Alex Thomas, Cristiano Menezes, Aaron J Buckland, Kaveh Khajavi, Kimberly Ashayeri, Brett A Braly, Brian Kwon, Ivan Cheng, Pedro Berjano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following 120 consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J Alex ThomasAtlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA. Alext9999@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6706-6539
Cristiano MenezesHVC Hospital and Columna Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Aaron J BucklandMelbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kaveh KhajaviGeorgia Spine and Neurosurgery Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kimberly AshayeriDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Brett A BralyThe Spine Clinic of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Brian KwonNew England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ivan ChengAustin Spine, Austin, TX, USA.
Pedro BerjanoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide definitions and a conceptual framework for single position surgery (SPS) applied to circumferential fusion of the lumbar spine.

methodsNarrative literature review and experts' opinion.

resultsTwo major limitations of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been (a) a perceived need to reposition the patient to the prone position for posterior fixation, and (b) the lack of a robust solution for fusion at the L5/S1 level. Recently, two strategies for performing single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion have been described. The combination of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position (LALIF), LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (pPSF) in the lateral decubitus position is known as lateral single-position surgery (LSPS). Prone LLIF (PLLIF) involves transpsoas LLIF done in the prone position that is more familiar for surgeons to then implant pedicle screw fixation. This can be referred to as prone single-position surgery (PSPS). In this review, we describe the evolution of and rationale for single-position spinal surgery. Pertinent studies validating LSPS and PSPS are reviewed and future questions regarding the future of these techniques are posed. Lastly, we present an algorithm for single-position surgery that describes the utility of LALIF, LLIF and PLLIF in the treatment of patients requiring AP lumbar fusions.

conclusionsSingle position surgery in circumferential fusion of the lumbar spine includes posterior fixation in association with any of the following: lateral position LLIF, prone position LLIF, lateral position ALIF, and their combination (lateral position LLIF+ALIF). Preliminary studies have validated these methods.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionPatient PositioningALIFLLIFProne-lateralSingle-positionXLIF

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.