ArticleNeuroradiology2022
Rule-based natural language processing for automation of stroke data extraction: a validation study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of respiratory virus immunization using natural language processing.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluating local open-source large language models for data extraction from unstructured reports on mechanical thrombectomy in patients with ischemic stroke.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical applications of large language models in medicine and surgery: A scoping review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Thyroid Ultrasound Appropriateness Identification Through Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Machine Intelligence in Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Direct Clinical Applications of Natural Language Processing in Common Neurological Disorders: Scoping Review.JMIR neurotechnology · 2024Review
- Reliability and Efficiency of the CAPRI-3 Metastatic Prostate Cancer Registry Driven by Artificial Intelligence.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeData extraction from radiology free-text reports is time consuming when performed manually. Recently, more automated extraction methods using natural language processing (NLP) are proposed. A previously developed rule-based NLP algorithm showed promise in its ability to extract stroke-related data from radiology reports. We aimed to externally validate the accuracy of CHARTextract, a rule-based NLP algorithm, to extract stroke-related data from free-text radiology reports.
methodsFree-text reports of CT angiography (CTA) and perfusion (CTP) studies of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to a regional stroke center for endovascular thrombectomy were analyzed from January 2015 to 2021. Stroke-related variables were manually extracted as reference standard from clinical reports, including proximal and distal anterior circulation occlusion, posterior circulation occlusion, presence of ischemia or hemorrhage, Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS), and collateral status. These variables were simultaneously extracted using a rule-based NLP algorithm. The NLP algorithm's accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed.
resultsThe NLP algorithm's accuracy was > 90% for identifying distal anterior occlusion, posterior circulation occlusion, hemorrhage, and ASPECTS. Accuracy was 85%, 74%, and 79% for proximal anterior circulation occlusion, presence of ischemia, and collateral status respectively. The algorithm confirmed the absence of variables from radiology reports with an 87-100% accuracy.
conclusionsRule-based NLP has a moderate to good performance for stroke-related data extraction from free-text imaging reports. The algorithm's accuracy was affected by inconsistent report styles and lexicon among reporting radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.