ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Correlation of Riolan's arch diameter to treatment choice in patients with isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can preoperative CT angiography and three-dimensional reconstruction of the mesenteric artery of the colon improve laparoscopic colectomy and postoperative rehabilitation in patients with colon cancer? A pilot randomized control study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Trial
- Computed tomography predictors of failure of conservative management in isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Observational
- Hepatic artery diameter predicts bleeding risk after gastroesophageal varices treatment: a contrast-enhanced CT study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the diameter changes of Riolan's arch in patients with isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) and to evaluate the implication for treatment selection.
methodsNinety-five patients with CT angiography (CTA) confirmed ISMAD were retrospectively included, and another 95 cases with no positive findings on abdominal CTA were included as controls. According to the treatment methods, the patients were subsequently divided into conservative treatment (n = 68) or invasive treatment (n = 27) subgroups. According to the initial CTA images, the prevalence of Riolan's arch as well as its diameter (D
resultsRiolan's arch prevalence and D
conclusionDilation of Riolan's arch is common in patients with ISMAD, and Riolan's arch diameter could be a convenient indicator of disease severity and inform subsequent treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.