Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913454›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

Surveillance Imaging vs Symptomatic Recurrence Detection and Survival in Stage II-III Breast Cancer (AFT-01).

Jessica R Schumacher, Heather B Neuman, Menggang Yu, David J Vanness, Yajuan Si, Elizabeth S Burnside, Kathryn J Ruddy, Ann H Partridge, Deborah Schrag, Stephen B Edge and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02171078 (Post-Treatment Surveillance in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02171078 completednot on this map

Post-Treatment Surveillance in Breast Cancer: Bringing Cost Effectiveness Research (CER) to the Alliance

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2014 to 2017Enrolled34,359ConditionsBreast Neoplasms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica R SchumacherDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-9498
Heather B NeumanDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Menggang YuDepartment of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-3155
David J VannessDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, Penn State University, State College, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9790-2988
Yajuan SiSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-7374
Elizabeth S BurnsideDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6600-435X
Kathryn J RuddyDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-332X
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Deborah SchragDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4334-5717
Stephen B EdgeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Elizabeth A JacobsDepartment of Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jeffrey HavlenaDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Amanda B FrancescattiCommission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA.
David P WinchesterCommission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel P McKellarCommission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patricia A SpearsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Benjamin D KozowerDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
George J ChangDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Caprice C GreenbergDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alliance ACS-CRP CCDR Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAmerican College of Surgeons · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USMayo Clinic · USPennsylvania State University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWright State University · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY / SITEMAN CANCER CENTER LEAD ACADEMIC SITEUG1CA233339 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NANCY L BARTLETT, Clifford Grant Robinson · 2019 to 2026
$11.3M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesKL2TR000136 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$6.6M
BUILDING INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CAREER IN WOMEN'S HEALTH (BIRCWH) SCHOLARSK12HD055894 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2007 to 2016
$4.1M
Clinical Academic Oncologist Training ProgramK12CA087718 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ALBERTINI, MARK R · 2000 to 2008
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000136NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NCI NIH HHS K12 CA087718NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233339NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for follow-up after locoregional breast cancer treatment recommend imaging for distant metastases only in the presence of patient signs and/or symptoms. However, guidelines have not been updated to reflect advances in imaging, systemic therapy, or the understanding of biological subtype. We assessed the association between mode of distant recurrence detection and survival.

methodsIn this observational study, a stage-stratified random sample of women with stage II-III breast cancer in 2006-2007 and followed through 2016 was selected, including up to 10 women from each of 1217 Commission on Cancer facilities (n = 10 076). The explanatory variable was mode of recurrence detection (asymptomatic imaging vs signs and/or symptoms). The outcome was time from initial cancer diagnosis to death. Registrars abstracted scan type, intent (cancer-related vs not, asymptomatic surveillance vs not), and recurrence. Data were merged with each patient's National Cancer Database record.

resultsSurveillance imaging detected 23.3% (284 of 1220) of distant recurrences (76.7%, 936 of 1220 by signs and/or symptoms). Based on propensity-weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, patients with asymptomatic imaging compared with sign and/or symptom detected recurrences had a lower risk of death if estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative, HER2 negative (triple negative; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.99), or HER2 positive (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.80). No association was observed for ER- or PR-positive, HER2-negative (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.44) cancers.

conclusionsRecurrence detection by asymptomatic imaging compared with signs and/or symptoms was associated with lower risk of death for triple-negative and HER2-positive, but not ER- or PR-positive, HER2-negative cancers. A randomized trial is warranted to evaluate imaging surveillance for metastases results in these subgroups.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID35913454
PMCPMC9552308
OpenAlexW4289260683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.