Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913442›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2022

Lesion Volume in a Bi- or Multivariate Prediction Model for the Management of PI-RADS v2.1 Score 3 Category Lesions.

Eugenio Martorana, Maria Cristina Aisa, Riccardo Grisanti, Nicola Santini, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Alessandro Datti, Sandro Gerli, Alessandra Bonora, Aldo Burani, Giovanni Battista Scalera and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eugenio MartoranaDepartment of Urology, New Civilian Hospital of Sassuolo, Modena, Italy.
Maria Cristina AisaDivision of Gynaecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia University, Perugia, Italy.
Riccardo GrisantiDepartment of Urology, New Civilian Hospital of Sassuolo, Modena, Italy.
Nicola SantiniDepartment of Radiology, New Civilian Hospital of Sassuolo, Modena, Italy.
Giacomo Maria PirolaDepartment of Urology, Usl Toscana Sud Est, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
Alessandro DattiDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Perugia University, Perugia, Italy.
Sandro GerliDivision of Gynaecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia University, Perugia, Italy.
Alessandra BonoraDivision of Anaesthesia, Casa di Cura Fogliani, Modena, Italy.
Aldo BuraniDepartment of Radiology, New Civilian Hospital of Sassuolo, Modena, Italy.
Giovanni Battista ScaleraDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia University, Italy.
Pietro ScialpiDivision of Urology, Portogruaro Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Aldo Di BlasiDivision of Radiology, Tivoli Hospital, Tivoli, Italy.
Michele ScialpiDivision of Radiology 2, Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia University, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed at improving the discrimination of Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score 3 suspicious prostate cancer lesions using lesion volume evaluation. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo hundred five PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions were submitted to transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy. The lesion volumes were estimated on diffusion-weighted imaging sequence and distributed in PI-RADS 3a (LV < 0.5 mL) and PI-RADS 3b (LV ≥ 0.5 mL) subcategories, using a 0.5 mL cutoff value. Data were retrospectively matched with histopathological findings from the biopsy. Assuming that lesions with LV < or ≥ 0.5 mL were respectively not eligible (benign and indolent PCa lesions) or eligible for biopsy (significant PCa lesions), the diagnostic accuracy of lesion volume in determining clinically significant PCa at biopsy was evaluated using a bi- or multivariate model.

resultsAbout 55.1% and 44.9% of lesions were distributed in subcategories 3a and 3b, respectively. The overall PI-RADS score 3 detection rate was 273%. 3.5% (1.95% of total), and 25% (11.7% of total) significant PCa were found in PI-RADS 3a and 3b subcategory, respectively. The method showed 85.2% sensitivity, 61.2% specificity, 25% positive predictive value, and 96.5% negative predictive value and avoided 55.1% of unnecessary biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy in determining significant PCa at biopsy was 73.2% or 86.5% depending on whether lesion volume was used alone or in combination with prostate volume and patient age in a multivariate model.

conclusion0.5 mL lesion volume cutoff value significantly discriminates fusion-targeted biopsy need in PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions and its diagnostic accuracy improves when it combines with prostate volume and age in a multivariate model.

Identifiers

PMID35913442
PMCPMC9612700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.