Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913262›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Tissue Recognition Based on Electrical Impedance Classified by Support Vector Machine in Spinal Operation Area.

Bingrong Chen, Yongwang Shi, Jiahao Li, Jiliang Zhai, Liang Liu, Wenyong Liu, Lei Hu, Yu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-driven tissue discrimination sensing methods for robot-assisted spine surgery: a state-of-the-art review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bingrong ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yongwang ShiMD Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiahao LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiliang ZhaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3441-8109
Liang LiuChina Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China.
Wenyong LiuSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Lei HuSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-2014

Funding

Department of S and T for Social Development 2018YFB1307603Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L192061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOne of the major difficulties in spinal surgery is the injury of important tissues caused by tissue misclassification, which is the source of surgical complications. Accurate recognization of the tissues is the key to increase safety and effect as well as to reduce the complications of spinal surgery. The study aimed at tissue recognition in the spinal operation area based on electrical impedance and the boundaries of electrical impedance between cortical bone, cancellous bone, spinal cord, muscle, and nucleus pulposus.

methodsTwo female white swines with body weight of 40 kg were used to expose cortical bone, cancellous bone, spinal cord, muscle, and nucleus pulposus under general anesthesia and aseptic conditions. The electrical impedance of these tissues at 12 frequencies (in the range of 10-100 kHz) was measured by electrochemical analyzer with a specially designed probe, at 22.0-25.0°C and 50%-60% humidity. Two types of tissue recognition models - one combines principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machine (SVM) and the other combines combines SVM and ensemble learning - were constructed, and the boundaries of electrical impedance of the five tissues at 12 frequencies of current were figured out. Linear correlation, two-way ANOVA, and paired T-test were conducted to analyze the relationship between the electrical impedance of different tissues at different frequencies.

resultsThe results suggest that the differences of electrical impedance mainly came from tissue type (p < 0.0001), the electrical impedance of five kinds of tissue was statistically different from each other (p < 0.0001). The tissue recognition accuracy of the algorithm based on principal component analysis and support vector machine ranged from 83%-100%, and the overall accuracy was 95.83%. The classification accuracy of the algorithm based on support vector machine and ensemble learning was 100%, and the boundaries of electrical impedance of five tissues at various frequencies were calculated.

conclusionThe electrical impedance of cortical bone, cancellous bone, spinal cord, muscle, and nucleus pulposus had significant differences in 10-100 kHz frequency. The application of support vector machine realized the accurate tissue recognition in the spinal operation area based on electrical impedance, which is expected to be translated and applied to tissue recognition during spinal surgery.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSupport Vector MachineAnimalsElectric ImpedanceFemaleSwineBioelectrical impedanceEnsemble learningPrincipal component analysisSupport vector machineTissue recognition

Identifiers

PMID35913262
PMCPMC9483044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.