Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35912731›Full record

Trial reportCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2022

Combined HPV 16 E2 and L1 methylation predict response to treatment with cidofovir and imiquimod in patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia.

Christopher Nicholas Hurt, Belinda Nedjai, Carlos Alvarez-Mendoza, Ned Powell, Amanda Tristram, Sadie Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher Nicholas HurtCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Belinda NedjaiWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Carlos Alvarez-MendozaQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Ned PowellCentre for Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Amanda TristramWellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sadie JonesSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBThe University of Queensland · AUWellington Hospital · NZ

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25350Cancer Research UK 27046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopical cidofovir and imiquimod can effectively treat approximately 55% of patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), thus avoiding the need for surgery. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E⁢2 gene methylation predicts response to treatment but a methylation measurement is only obtainable in approximately 50% of patients.

objectiveThis work aimed to determine if the applicability and predictive power of the E⁢2 methylation assay could be improved by combining it with the components of a host and viral DNA methylation panel (S5) that has been found to predict disease progression in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

methodsHPV E2 methylation and S5 classifier score were measured in fresh tissue samples collected pre-treatment from 132 patients with biopsy-proven VIN grade 3 who participated in a multicentre clinical trial and were randomised to treatment with cidofovir or imiquimod.

resultsCombining HPV16 E⁢2 and HPV16 L⁢1 methylation provides a biomarker that is both predictive of response to topical treatment and that can produce a clinically applicable result for all patients. Patients with HPV 16 L⁢1^high and HPV 16 E⁢2^high (36/132 (27.3%)) were more likely to respond to treatment with cidofovir (12/15 (80.0%)) than imiquimod (9/21 (42.9%)) (p= 0.026). Patients with HPV 16 L⁢1^low or HPV 16 E⁢2^low (including those with no HPV/unassessable methylation) were more likely to respond to imiquimod: 23/50 (46.0%) vs 31/46 (67.4%) (p= 0.035).

conclusionsCombined HPV E⁢2 and L⁢1 methylation is a potential predictive marker in treatment for all patients with VIN. These findings justify validation in a prospective trial.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVulvar NeoplasmsAminoquinolinesBiomarkersCidofovirDNA MethylationFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansImiquimodProspective StudiesAminoquinolinesBiomarkersCidofovirImiquimodcidofovirgene methylationHPVimiquimodpredictive biomarkerVulval intraepithelial neoplasia

Identifiers

PMID35912731
PMCPMC9661315
OpenAlexW4288043657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.