Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35912710›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2023

Caries Preventive Interventions and Oral Health Inequalities: A Scoping Review.

A W van Meijeren-van Lunteren, Y You, H Raat, E B Wolvius, L Kragt

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Untreated dental caries in Brazilian adolescents: analysis by the PUFA index.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A W van Meijeren-van LunterenThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Centre, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2802-2872
Y YouThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Centre, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
H RaatThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Centre, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E B WolviusThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Centre, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
L KragtThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Centre, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDental caries remains one of the most prevalent but preventable diseases among children worldwide and especially affects children with a lower socioeconomic status or ethnic minority background. It is important that all groups of children are reached by preventive interventions to reduce oral health inequalities. So far, it is unknown whether children from different social and ethnic groups benefit equally from potentially effective oral health interventions.

objectivesThis scoping review aimed to identify European public health interventions that report their effect on dental caries across different social groups.

methodsFour databases were searched for studies evaluating the effect of oral health interventions on dental caries among children from 0 to 12 y, and studies were included when results were presented by children of different social groups separately.

resultsA total of 14 studies were included, representing 4 different countries: 3 randomized and 11 nonrandomized studies. Most studies were performed at schools. Six studies showed results indicative of a reduction in oral health inequalities, 4 studies showed results that potentially widen oral health inequalities, and 5 studies showed results that were indicative of no impact on oral health inequalities. Interventions that contain early approaches, with a high frequency, approaching multiple levels of influence, and including at least the broader organizational or public policy level, may have the potential to reduce oral health inequalities among children from birth to young adolescence.

conclusionWe recommend researchers to perform high-quality intervention studies and to evaluate the effectiveness of oral health intervention always in different socioeconomic or ethnic groups separately, to better understand their contribution toward oral health (in)equalities. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This review offers insight in the differential effects that oral health interventions might have across different social groups. Its results can be used to develop interventions that might reduce oral health inequalities among children. Also, we recommend future researchers to always evaluate the effects of any preventive oral health measure in different social groups separately.

Indexed as

Dental CariesOral HealthChildChild, PreschoolDental Caries SusceptibilityEthnicityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMinority Groupscommunity dentistrydental healthhealth disparitieshealth promotionpublic healthsocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID35912710
PMCPMC10504820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.