ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2023
Trends in mental health service utilisation by Australia's older population.
Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community-based health and social care demand associated with frailty in people aged 50 and over in England 2025-40: routine data analyses and simulation modelling.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Challenges in the End-of-Life Care for Patients With Severe Persistent Mental Illness: A Case Series.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026Article
- Beliefs that explain mental health help-seeking intention among older men: a reasoned action approach.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Promoting Geropsychology: A Memorandum for Research, Policies, Education Programs, and Practices for Healthy Aging.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Review
- Trends in mental health service utilisation by Australia's older population.Australasian journal on ageing · 2023Article
- Hospitalisations related to administration errors of psychotropic drugs: a nationwide retrospective study between 1998 and 2019 in Australia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine the incidence, trends, and differences between age groups and sex in Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS)-subsidised mental health service utilisation by older Australians over the past 10 years.
methodsA cross-sectional cohort study between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2019 was conducted using publicly available MBS data for older individuals aged ≥65 years. Age- and sex-standardised yearly incidence rates of psychological therapy (MBS M06), GP mental health treatments (MBS A20), focussed psychological strategy (MBS M07), and psychiatric attendances (MBS A08) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) estimated using Poisson regression were calculated.
resultsOverall, the rate of utilisation of primary care mental health services by the older population increased over the study period, with psychological therapy claims increasing the greatest from 14.4/1000 older persons in 2009/10 to 38.5/1000 in 2018/19 (IRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.13), followed by GP mental health treatments increasing from 43.7/1000 (95% CI 43.4-43.9) in 2009/10 to 81.0/1000 (95% CI 80.7-81.3) in 2018/19 (IRR 1.07/year, 95% CI 1.06-1.09). Females aged 65-74 years had the highest use of GP mental health treatments at 123.8/1000 compared to 63.6/1000 in males in 2018/2019.
conclusionsWhile utilisation of mental health services by the older population in Australia has increased over the study period, it is important that policymakers and service providers continue to support access and use of these services, which may facilitate well-being and quality of life in the older population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.