Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35912254›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Endoscopic-assisted transorbital surgery: Where do we stand on the scott's parabola? personal considerations after a 10-year experience.

Iacopo Dallan, Lodovica Cristofani-Mencacci, Giacomo Fiacchini, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Wouter van Furth, Matteo de Notaris, Miriana Picariello, Enrico Alexandre, Christos Georgalas, Luca Bruschini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Transorbital Route to Intracranial Space.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  6. 360 Degrees Endoscopic Access to and Through the Orbit.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iacopo DallanEar Nose Throat (ENT) Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, AziendaOspedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Lodovica Cristofani-MencacciEar Nose Throat (ENT) Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, AziendaOspedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giacomo FiacchiniEar Nose Throat (ENT) Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, AziendaOspedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mario Turri-ZanoniENT Unit, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Wouter van FurthNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Matteo de NotarisNeurosurgery Operative Unit, Department of Neuroscience, "San Pio" Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Miriana PicarielloEar Nose Throat (ENT) Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, AziendaOspedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Enrico AlexandreEar Nose Throat (ENT) Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, AziendaOspedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Christos GeorgalasMedical School, University of Nicosia, Athens, Greece.
Luca BruschiniEar Nose Throat (ENT) Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, AziendaOspedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transorbital approaches are genuinely versatile surgical routes which show interesting potentials in skull base surgery. Given their "new" trajectory, they can be a very useful adjunct to traditional routes, even being a valid alternative to them in some cases, and add valuable opportunities in selected patients. Indications are constantly expanding, and currently include selected intraorbital, skull base and even intra-axial lesions, both benign and malignant. Given their relatively recent development and thus unfamiliarity among the skull base community, achieving adequate proficiency needs not only a personalized training and knowledge but also, above all, an adequate case volume and a dedicated setting. Current, but mostly future, applications should be selected by genetic, omics and biological features and applied in the context of a truly multidisciplinary environment.

Indexed as

learning curvemultiportal surgeryorbital surgeryskull base surgeryTOAstransorbital endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35912254
PMCPMC9334664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.