Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35912176›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Resection of the Primary Tumor Improves the Survival of Patients With Stage IV Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Zefeng Li, Hu Ren, Tongbo Wang, Xiaojie Zhang, Lulu Zhao, Chongyuan Sun, Penghui Niu, Chunguang Guo, Yingtai Chen, Dongbing Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zefeng LiDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hu RenDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tongbo WangDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaojie ZhangDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lulu ZhaoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chongyuan SunDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Penghui NiuDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chunguang GuoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yingtai ChenDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Dongbing ZhaoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prognostic prolongation effect of surgical resection in the management of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) with distant metastases was still uncertain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of primary tumor resection (PTR) with outcomes in patients with stage IV GNEC. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with distant metastatic GNEC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 and identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were divided into PTR and non-PTR groups. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox-regression analyses (uni- and multivariate) were performed to evaluate factors potentially influencing survival. Results: A total of 126 patients with a median follow-up of 79 months were identified. Forty-four patients underwent PTR and 82 patients did not undergo surgery. After the IPTW approach, PTR improved the OS in patients with stage IV GNEC (median OS 12 vs. 6 months, P = 0.010). The 1- and 3-year OS for patients with or without PTR were 43.8% and 34.5%, and 27.9% and 6.5%, respectively. The median CSS was 12 months for patients undergoing PTR and 6 months for those who did not. The 1 and 3-year CSS for patients with or without PTR were 45.1% and 37.0%, and 27.9% and 6.5%, respectively. In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, PTR was recognized as an independent factor for improved survival after the occurrence of distant metastatic disease [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.305; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.196, 0.475; and CSS: HR = 0.278; 95% CI: 0.171, 0.452]. Conclusion: PTR for stage IV GNEC contributes to a better prognosis compared with non-surgery. This study supported the resection of the primary tumor in patients with distant metastatic GNEC.

Indexed as

distant metastasesgastric neuroendocrine carcinomaprimary tumor resectionstage IVsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35912176
PMCPMC9329560
OpenAlexW4285389462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.