Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35912062›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2022

Sentiment analysis of COVID-19 social media data through machine learning.

Dharmendra Dangi, Dheeraj K Dixit, Amit Bhagat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dharmendra DangiDepartment of Mathematics, Bioinformatics and Computer Applications, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4431-3116
Dheeraj K DixitDepartment of Mathematics, Bioinformatics and Computer Applications, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India.
Amit BhagatDepartment of Mathematics, Bioinformatics and Computer Applications, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemics are a severe threat to lives in the universe and our universe encounters several pandemics till now. COVID-19 is one of them, which is a viral infectious disease that increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. This has a negative impact on countries' economies, as well as social and political concerns throughout the world. The growths of social media have witnessed much pandemic-related news and are shared by many groups of people. This social media news was also helpful to analyze the effects of the pandemic clearly. Twitter is one of the social media networks where people shared COVID-19 related news in a wider range. Meanwhile, several approaches have been proposed to analyze the COVID-19 related sentimental analysis. To enhance the accuracy of sentimental analysis, we have proposed a novel approach known as Sentimental Analysis of Twitter social media Data (SATD). Our proposed method is based on five different machine learning models such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifier, Multinomial NB Classifier, Support Vector Machine, and Decision Tree Classifier. These five classifiers possess various advantages and hence the proposed approach effectively classifies the tweets from the Twint. Experimental analyses are made and these classifier models are used to calculate different values such as precision, recall, f1-score, and support. Moreover, the results are also represented as a confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) graphs. From the experimental and discussion section, it is obtained that the accuracy of our proposed classifier model is high.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision treeLogistic regressionMultinomial Naïve BayesRandom forestSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID35912062
PMCPMC9309239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.