ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Developing an Asymmetry Method for Detecting Postictal Hyperperfusion in Poststroke Epilepsy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using dual single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanning, we recently found the postictal-interictal (P-I) subtraction method frequently detects prolonged postictal hyperperfusion in poststroke epilepsy (PSE) and thus may be valuable for auxiliary diagnosis. This study aimed to determine if the asymmetry method can localize hyperperfusion to reflect epileptic activity in PSE using a single postictal SPECT scan. Sixty-four patients with PSE who had undergone perfusion SPECT two times (postictal and interictal) were enrolled. We formulated a novel asymmetry method (subtraction analysis of reversed postictal SPECT from postictal SPECT, co-registered to magnetic resonance imaging) to identify paradoxical asymmetric increase, defined as a higher perfusion area adjacent to stroke lesions compared to the contralateral side. The postictal hyperperfusion area and detection rates were determined by the asymmetry and P-I subtraction methods independently. We subsequently calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the asymmetry method, compared to the gold standard P-I subtraction method. We also evaluated lateralization concordance between the asymmetry method and other clinical findings. Among 64 patients (median age, 75 years), prolonged postictal hyperperfusion was detected in 43 (67%) by the asymmetry, and 54 (84%) the P-I, method. The asymmetry method had high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%) in detecting postictal hyperperfusion, showing high lateralization concordance with seizure semiology (97%) and epileptiform electroencephalography findings (interictal/ictal epileptiform discharges or periodic discharges) (100%). The present study demonstrated the advantages of the objective asymmetry method for detecting prolonged hyperperfusion through using one postictal SPECT scan in PSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.