Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Mining of Marburg Virus Proteome for Designing an Epitope-Based Vaccine.

Mohamed A Soltan, Waleed K Abdulsahib, Mahmoud Amer, Ahmed M Refaat, Alaa A Bagalagel, Reem M Diri, Sarah Albogami, Eman Fayad, Refaat A Eid, Sherin M A Sharaf and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed A SoltanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Waleed K AbdulsahibDepartment of pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Al- Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Mahmoud AmerInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmed M RefaatZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Minia University, El-Minia, Egypt.
Alaa A BagalagelDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Reem M DiriDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah AlbogamiDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Eman FayadDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Refaat A EidDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Sherin M A SharafDepartment of Microbiology, Egyptian Drug Authority (EDA), Giza, Egypt.
Sameh S ElhadyDepartment of Natural Products, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled M DarwishDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Muhammad Alaa EldeenCell Biology, Histology and Genetics Division, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
King Abdulaziz University · SATaif University · SAZagazig University · EGEgyptian Government · EGKing Khalid University · SAMinia University · EGSinai University · EGSuez Canal University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marburg virus (MARV) is one of the most harmful zoonotic viruses with deadly effects on both humans and nonhuman primates. Because of its severe outbreaks with a high rate of fatality, the world health organization put it as a risk group 4 pathogen and focused on the urgent need for the development of effective solutions against that virus. However, up to date, there is no effective vaccine against MARV in the market. In the current study, the complete proteome of MARV (seven proteins) was analyzed for the antigenicity score and the virulence or physiological role of each protein where we nominated envelope glycoprotein (Gp), Transcriptional activator (VP30), and membrane-associated protein (VP24) as the candidates for epitope prediction. Following that, a vaccine construct was designed based on CTL, HTL, and BCL epitopes of the selected protein candidates and to finalize the vaccine construct, several amino acid linkers, β-defensin adjuvant, and PADRE peptides were incorporated. The generated potential vaccine was assessed computationally for several properties such as antigenicity, allergenicity, stability, and other structural features where the outcomes of these assessments nominated this potential vaccine to be validated for its binding affinity with two molecular targets TLR-8 and TLR-4. The binding score and the stability of the vaccine-receptor complex, which was deeply studied through molecular docking-coupled dynamics simulation, supported the selection of our designed vaccine as a putative solution for MARV that should be validated through future wet-lab experiments. Here, we describe the computational approach for designing and analysis of this potential vaccine.

Indexed as

MarburgvirusAnimalsEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansMolecular Docking SimulationProteomeVaccines, SubunitEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteProteomeVaccines, Subunitepitope mappinghealth careimmunoinformaticsMarburg virusmultitope vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35911751
PMCPMC9334820
OpenAlexW4285593338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.