Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911625›Full record

ReviewEnfermeria intensiva2022

[Hand hygiene and pandemic. Controversies].

I Fernández-Moreno, R García-Díez, M Vázquez-Calatayud, Comité Asesor del Programa de Seguridad de los Proyectos Zero

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Enfermeria intensiva, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I Fernández-MorenoCorporación Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, España.
R García-DíezÁrea de Seguridad del Paciente, Osi Bilbao, Basurto, Bilbao, Vizcaya.
M Vázquez-CalatayudÁrea de Desarrollo Profesional e Investigación en Enfermería, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Grupo de investigación ICCP-UNAV, Innovación para un Cuidado Centrado en la Persona, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Navarra, España.
Comité Asesor del Programa de Seguridad de los Proyectos Zero

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the world's healthcare systems were extremely strained. Intensive care units were stretched to capacity and healthcare facilities were forced to set up spaces to care for critically ill patients. Professionals were required to work in strenuous conditions, completely disrupting their work routines.In this scenario, hand hygiene and the use of gloves by healthcare professionals became a critical point of transmission risk.The results of the ENVIN study in 2020 and 2021, corresponding to the pandemic period, showed worrying data on the increase in infection rates, with rates rising by 250% at the worst moments of the pandemic. This suggested that excessive risk situations were occurring for the patient. Any preventive strategy must place correct hand hygiene and proper use of gloves among its priority objectives. For this reason, the Project Zero Advisory Board made a series of adaptations and recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinion related to hand hygiene and glove use during the pandemic situation to promote best practice in extreme situations. This article reviews the key aspects of hand hygiene as part of the WHO safety strategy, the main barriers to compliance and the main adaptations proposed by the Advisory Board of the Zero projects.

Indexed as

AdaptationsCare-associated infectionCOVID-19GlovesHand hygieneRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID35911625
PMCPMC9308018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.