Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911624›Full record

ReviewEnfermeria intensiva2022

[Update of the recommendations of the Pneumonia Zero project].

S Arias-Rivera, R Jam-Gatell, X Nuvials-Casals, M Vázquez-Calatayud, equipo Neumonía Zero

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Enfermeria intensiva, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Arias-RiveraInvestigación de enfermería. Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe. CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
R Jam-GatellÁrea de críticos. Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, España.
X Nuvials-CasalsServicio de Medicina Intensiva. Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España.
M Vázquez-CalatayudÁrea de Desarrollo Profesional e investigación de Enfermería, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Universidad de Navarra. IdisNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Navarra, España.
equipo Neumonía Zero

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-Cov-2 pandemic has had a negative impact on the implementation of the Zero Pneumonia recommendations and has been accompanied by an increase in rates of ventilator- associated pneumonia (VAP) in intensive care units in Spain. With the aim of reducing the current rates to 7 episodes per 1000 days of MV, the recommendations of the initial project have been updated.Twenty-seven measures were identified and classified into 12 functional measures (semi- sitting position, strict hand hygiene, airway manipulation training, daily assessment of possible extubation, protocolisation of weaning, early tracheostomy, non-invasive ventilation, microbiological surveillance, tubing change, humidification, respiratory physiotherapy, post- pyloric enteral nutrition), 7 mechanical measures (pneumotap pressure control, subglottic suction tubes, subglottic suctioning of tubes, subglottic suctioning of tubes, post-pyloric enteral nutrition, subglottic suction tubes, small-bore/small-bowel tube nutrition, closed/open circuit secretion suctioning, respiratory filters, tooth brushing, negative pressure techniques for secretion suctioning) and 8 pharmacological (selective digestive decontamination, oropharyngeal decontamination, short course of antibiotics, chlorhexidine mouth hygiene, inhaled antibiotics, antibiotic rotation, probiotics, monoclonal antibodies).Each measure was analysed independently, by at least two members of the working group, through a systematic review of the literature and an iterative review of recommendations from scientific societies and/or expert groups.For the classification of the quality of the evidence and strength of the recommendations, the GRADE group proposal was followed. To determine the level of recommendation, each measure was scored by all members of the working group in relation to its effectiveness, tolerability and applicability in Spanish ICUs in the short term. The support of external experts was requested for some of the measures reviewed. Those measures that achieved the highest score were selected.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitsMechanical ventilationMortalityPneumoniaPrevention

Identifiers

PMID35911624
PMCPMC9326456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.