Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy in

Feng-Wang Hu, Shang Chang, Qian Li, Yong-Xiang Zhu, Xin-Yu Wang, You-Wei Cheng, Qi-Hua Zhou, Bing Liu, Javaid Iqbal, Xiao-Xia Tang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Drug-Coated Balloons Beyond In-Stent Restenosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Drug-coated balloon vs drug-eluting stent in de novo coronary lesions: a propensity score matched cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Drug-coated balloons for treatingWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Feng-Wang HuDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Shang ChangDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Qian LiDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yong-Xiang ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xin-Yu WangDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
You-Wei ChengDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Qi-Hua ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Renci Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Bing LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Peixian County Guotai Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Javaid IqbalDepartment of Cardiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Xiao-Xia TangDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yao-Jun ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Use of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only strategy for revascularization of native large coronary artery lesions is on the rise. The long-term efficacy of this approach for bifurcation and non-bifurcation lesions remains unknown. We aim to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of DCB-only strategy for the treatment of Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled 119 patients with Results: Of 119 patients with 138 lesions, 66 patients (75 lesions) had bifurcation and 53 patients (63 lesions) had non-bifurcation lesions. Average reference vessel diameter was 3.1 ± 0.3 mm, and there was no difference in bifurcation and non-bifurcation group (3.0 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 0.3mm; Conclusion: DCB-only strategy for

Indexed as

coronary bifurcation lesionscoronary de novo lesiondrug-coated balloonlarge coronary vesselspercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID35911516
PMCPMC9329593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.