Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911510›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Different Impacts on the Heart After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination: Insights From Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Jan Gröschel, Yashraj Bhoyroo, Edyta Blaszczyk, Ralf Felix Trauzeddel, Darian Viezzer, Hadil Saad, Maximilian Fenski, Jeanette Schulz-Menger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals myocardial involvement in patients with active stage of inflammatory bowel disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID.Circulation research · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jan GröschelCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Yashraj BhoyrooCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Edyta BlaszczykCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf Felix TrauzeddelCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Darian ViezzerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Hadil SaadCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Maximilian FenskiCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Jeanette Schulz-MengerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Myocarditis-like findings after COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection and vaccination were reported by applying cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). These results are very heterogenous and dependent on several factors such as hospital admission or outpatient treatment, timing of CMR, and symptomatic load. This retrospective study aimed to identify differences in myocardial damage in patients with persistent symptoms both after COVID-19 infection and vaccine by applying CMR. Materials and Methods: This study entails a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CMR between August 2020 and November 2021 with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Patients were compared to healthy controls (HC). All patients underwent a CMR examination in a 1.5-T scanner with a scan protocol including: cine imaging for biventricular function and strain assessment using feature tracking, T2 mapping for the quantification of edema, and T1 mapping for diffuse fibrosis and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for the detection and quantification of focal fibrosis. Patients were divided into a subacute COVID-19 (sCov) group with symptoms lasting < 12 weeks, post-COVID-19 (pCov) group with symptoms > 12 weeks, and patients after COVID-19 vaccination (CovVac). Results: A total of 162 patients were recruited of whom 141 were included for analysis. The median age in years (interquartile range (IQR)) of the entire cohort was 45 (37-56) which included 83 women and 58 men. Subgroups were as follows (total patients per subgroup, median age in years (IQR), main gender): 34 sCov, 43 (37-52), 19 women; 63 pCov, 52 (39-58), 43 women; 44 CovVac, 43 (32-56), 23 men; 44 HC (41 (28-52), 24 women). The biventricular function was preserved and revealed no differences between the groups. No active inflammation was detected by T2 mapping. Global T1 values were higher in pCov in comparison with HC (median (IQR) in ms: pCov 1002ms (981-1023) vs. HC 987ms (963-1009; Conclusion: Patients after COVID-19 infection showed more focal fibrosis in comparison with patients after COVID-19 vaccination without alterations in the biventricular function.

Indexed as

cardiovascular magnetic resonanceCOVID-19fibrosislate gadolinium enhancementmappingvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35911510
PMCPMC9329612
OpenAlexW4285387457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.