Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911439›Full record

ReviewSN computer science2022

Deep Learning Models for the Diagnosis and Screening of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Shah Siddiqui, Murshedul Arifeen, Adrian Hopgood, Alice Good, Alexander Gegov, Elias Hossain, Wahidur Rahman, Shazzad Hossain, Sabila Al Jannat, Rezowan Ferdous and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SN computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shah SiddiquiFaculty of Technology, The University of Portsmouth (UoP), Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-9572
Murshedul ArifeenTime Research and Innovation (TRI), 189 Foundry Lane, Southampton, SO15 3JZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8010-7435
Adrian HopgoodFaculty of Technology, The University of Portsmouth (UoP), Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7183-5799
Alice GoodFaculty of Technology, The University of Portsmouth (UoP), Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1624-1218
Alexander GegovFaculty of Technology, The University of Portsmouth (UoP), Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-296X
Elias HossainTime Research and Innovation (TRI), 189 Foundry Lane, Southampton, SO15 3JZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9364-7916
Wahidur RahmanTime Research and Innovation (TRI), 189 Foundry Lane, Southampton, SO15 3JZ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6115-2364
Shazzad HossainTime Research and Innovation (TRI), 189 Foundry Lane, Southampton, SO15 3JZ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-5395
Sabila Al JannatTime Research and Innovation (TRI), 189 Foundry Lane, Southampton, SO15 3JZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-1577
Rezowan FerdousTime Research and Innovation (TRI), 189 Foundry Lane, Southampton, SO15 3JZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-2817
Shamsul MasumFaculty of Technology, The University of Portsmouth (UoP), Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-9356
Foundry (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Portsmouth · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has been declared as a global pandemic by WHO. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 patients may reduce the impact of coronavirus using modern computational methods like deep learning. Various deep learning models based on CT and chest X-ray images are studied and compared in this study as an alternative solution to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions. This study consists of three stages: planning, conduction, and analysis/reporting. In the conduction stage, inclusion and exclusion criteria are applied to the literature searching and identification. Then, we have implemented quality assessment rules, where over 75 scored articles in the literature were included. Finally, in the analysis/reporting stage, all the papers are reviewed and analysed. After the quality assessment of the individual papers, this study adopted 57 articles for the systematic literature review. From these reviews, the critical analysis of each paper, including the represented matrix for the model evaluation, existing contributions, and motivation, has been tracked with suitable illustrations. We have also interpreted several insights of each paper with appropriate annotation. Further, a set of comparisons has been enumerated with suitable discussion. Convolutional neural networks are the most commonly used deep learning architecture for COVID-19 disease classification and identification from X-ray and CT images. Various prior studies did not include data from a hospital setting nor did they consider data preprocessing before training a deep learning model.

Indexed as

Computed tomography (CT) imagesCoronavirus (COVID-19)Deep learning (DL)Machine learning (ML)RT-PCRX-ray images

Identifiers

PMID35911439
PMCPMC9312319
OpenAlexW4287578664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.