Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911403›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022

Diagnostic Utility of Non-invasive Tests for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Umbrella Review.

Jin-Tong Shi, Yuexin Zhang, Yuehan She, Hemant Goyal, Zhi-Qi Wu, Hua-Guo Xu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Diagnostic Guidance for C. difficile Infections.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers in IBD: What to Utilize for the Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Unmet Challenges in Patients with Crohn's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jin-Tong ShiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuexin ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuehan SheDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hemant GoyalBranch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Zhi-Qi WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hua-Guo XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to consolidate evidence from published systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the diagnostic performances of non-invasive tests for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in various clinical conditions and age groups. Methods: Two independent reviewers systematically identified and appraised systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the diagnostic utility of non-invasive tests for IBD. Each association was categorized as adults, children, and mixed population, based on the age ranges of patients included in the primary studies. We classified clinical scenarios into diagnosis, activity assessment, and predicting recurrence. Results: In total, 106 assessments from 43 reviews were included, with 17 non-invasive tests. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal lactoferrin (FL) were the most sensitive for distinguishing IBD from non-IBD. However, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and FL were the most specific for it. FC and FL were the most sensitive and specific tests, respectively, to distinguish IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Anti- Conclusion: In this umbrella review, we summarized the diagnostic performance of non-invasive tests for IBD in various clinical conditions and age groups. Clinicians can use the suggested non-invasive test depending on the appropriate clinical situation in IBD patients.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseasediagnostic performanceinflammatory bowel diseasenon-invasive testsulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID35911403
PMCPMC9337241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.