Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911350›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Patients With Perforated Appendicitis.

Sayed Farhad Rasuli, Jasmeen Naz, Najim Azizi, Nabeel Hussain, Pir Naveed Ahmed Ahsan Qureshi, Kiran Maee Swarnakari, Wahidullah Dost, Shumaila Zafar, Laila Tul Qadar, Abdul Subhan Talpur

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sayed Farhad RasuliGeneral Surgery, Liaquatian Academic and Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
Jasmeen NazGeneral Surgery, Liaquatian Academic and Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
Najim AziziGeneral Surgery, Liaquatian Academic and Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
Nabeel HussainGeneral Surgery, Liaquatian Academic and Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
Pir Naveed Ahmed Ahsan QureshiPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Hyderabad, PAK.
Kiran Maee SwarnakariGeneral Surgery, Liaquatian Academic and Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
Wahidullah DostGeneral Surgery, Liaquatian Academic and Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
Shumaila ZafarInternal Medicine, The University of Lahore, Lahore, PAK.
Laila Tul QadarInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, PAK.
Abdul Subhan TalpurMedicine, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK.
Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences · PKCivil Hospital Karachi · PKMayo Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Acute appendicitis can lead to perforation which can be lethal. The present study assessed the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis. Methodology A comparative study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (LUMHS), between March 2, 2019 and July 7, 2020. The inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Exclusion criteria consisted of intellectual disability hindering the procurement of informed consent, pediatric patients < 15 years of age, patients with an appendicular mass or abscess unsuited for laparoscopic appendectomy, severe sepsis or septic shock on presentation, and pregnant women. Patients were allocated to either open appendectomy (Group A) or laparoscopic appendectomy (Group B). The data gathering proforma recorded demographics, surgical findings, operating room (OR) time, length of inpatient care, requirement of analgesic, and any adverse events following surgery. All of the surgeries were conducted by an experienced surgical consultant with an experience of at least five years. Results A total of 85 patients were included in the laparoscopic appendectomy group, while 101 cases were included in the open appendectomy group. The use of analgesics thrice a day to manage the postoperative pain was significantly associated with the open appendectomy (p < 0.0001). Moreover, the postoperative length of hospitalization was substantially greater in patients who underwent open appendectomy than those who underwent laparoscopic procedure (p < 0.0001). Wound-related complications were considerably lower in patients who had laparoscopic appendectomy as compared to those who had open appendectomy (23.53% versus 40.5%; p = 0.013).  Conclusion The length of stay was significantly lower in patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Moreover, laparoscopic appendectomy was also associated with a lower rate of wound infection postoperatively, thus giving the former an edge over the latter. Despite the finding that the postoperative pain was not considerably different between the two groups, patients who underwent open appendectomy group required significantly more painkillers to manage the postoperative pain.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisappendectomylaparascopic surgerylaparoscopicperforated appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID35911350
PMCPMC9312283
OpenAlexW4283368873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.