Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911333›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

The Rapid Development of Glioblastoma: A Report of Two Cases.

George S Stoyanov, Emran Lyutfi, Radoslav Georgiev, Deyan L Dzhenkov, Ara Kaprelyan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George S StoyanovGeneral and Clinical Pathology, University Hospital St. Marina, Varna, BGR.
Emran LyutfiNeurology and Neuroscience, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.
Radoslav GeorgievRadiology and Radiotherapy, Division of Radiology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.
Deyan L DzhenkovGeneral and Clinical Pathology/Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.
Ara KaprelyanNeurology and Neuroscience, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse astrocytic gliomas and their most common and aggressive representation, glioblastoma (GBM), which as per the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines is an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype without alteration in histone 3 and has glomeruloid vascular proliferation, tumor necrosis, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification, or +7/-10 chromosome copy-number changes, are fast-growing tumors with a dismal patient prognosis. Herein, we present cases of a 63-year-old male who, despite no evidence of tumor growth, developed a 6-cm tumor, histologically verified as GBM, WHO CNS grade 4, within eight months, and a 74-year-old female in whom a 1.5-cm tumor grew to 43 mm within 28 days, once again histologically confirmed as GBM, WHO CNS grade 4. Other studies using previous WHO guidelines and including up to 106 cases have shown that these tumors have a daily growth rate of 1.4% and can double their size in a period varying from two weeks to 49.6 days. These growth rates further underline the need for extensive surgical resection as disease progression is rapid, with studies reporting that resection of more than 85% of the tumor volume determined on neuroradiology improves survival compared to biopsy or limited resection and resection of more than 98% of the tumor volume statistically improves patient survival.

Indexed as

case reportglioblastomaneuroradiologypathologytumor growth dynamics

Identifiers

PMID35911333
PMCPMC9314278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.