ArticleCureus2022
Ultraconservative and Aesthetic Approach for Rehabilitation of Complicated Crown Fracture of Tooth.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental trauma is well considered to be a general health issue. The prevalence of tooth fracture in the anterior region looks for a conservative approach to treatment. Currently, a novel and ultraconservative approach is the most popular treatment option for the rehabilitation of the fractured tooth. Fragment removal and proper repositioning followed by retention of the tooth's fragments using adhesive techniques provides added benefits such as aesthetics, restoration of surface gloss, function, shape, and texture, as well as maintaining the tooth's position and original morphology. Satisfactory results with less tooth destruction and utmost original anatomy preservation were seen during follow-ups. This approach is seen to be ultraconservative, safe, and pleasing aesthetically. However, careful planning, preoperative assessment, and case selection are the prerequisites in order to attain a favourable prognosis for the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.