ArticleCureus2022
Comparison of Efficacy Between Vaginal Sildenafil and Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Improving Endometrial Thickness (ET) in Infertile Women.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in improving endometrial function of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Vasodilators for women undergoing fertility treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Endometrial dysfunction in embryo implantation: from molecular mechanisms to clinical management.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- The Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Endometrial Receptivity of Implantation Failure Mouse.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Article
- What is the effect of sildenafil citrate intake on women undergoing assisted reproduction? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Infertility is presently an emanating preventive medicine issue with some severe societal repercussions associated with it. In India, approximately a score percent of couples bear the burden of infertility. Moreover, the declining fertility rates despite effective artificial reproductive techniques and increasing development of modern reproductive medicine from the last two censuses pose an alarm to the demographic progression data. Many studies have highlighted the importance of shifting the research focus to endometrial receptivity for increasing clinical pregnancy. Objective This research aims to compare the efficacy of treatments of vaginal sildenafil citrate and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) intrauterine injection in increasing endometrial thickness (ET). Methodology This was a randomized control trial (RCT) conducted over a two months period. Women seeking infertility treatment were recruited from the hospital's gynecological outpatient department (OPD). After the subjects gave informed consent, their history, clinical examination, and investigations were assessed. From the sixth day of the menstrual cycle, group A and group B had serial trans-vaginal ultra-sonographic evaluations for baseline endometrial thickness measurements. From day six to day 12 of the menstrual cycle, patients of group A were requested to self-administer per vaginal sildenafil citrate 25 mg every six hours. ET was evaluated sonographically on day 12 and day 14 of their menstrual cycle. Patients of group B received G-CSF 300 mcg/ml
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.