Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35911200›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Practical guide to using Kendall's

Shiyang Chen, Amin Ghadami, Bogdan I Epureanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A head-to-head comparison of health utilities and measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among people living with HIV in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Early Warning Signals in Ecological Time-Series.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interpretable early warnings using machine learning in an online game-experiment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shiyang ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8974-3705
Amin GhadamiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5883-4153
Bogdan I EpureanuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Forecasting tipping points in emerging and re-emerging infectious diseasesU01GM110744 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DRAKE, JOHN M, EPUREANU, BOGDAN · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM110744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrate that trends in indicators extracted from measured time series can indicate an approach of an impending transition. Kendall's

Indexed as

critical slowing downdynamical systemsearly warning signals

Identifiers

PMID35911200
PMCPMC9326300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.