Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910968›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2022

Advances on Self-Regulation Models: A New Research Agenda Through the SR vs ER Behavior Theory in Different Psychology Contexts.

Jesús de la Fuente, José Manuel Martínez-Vicente, Flavia H Santos, Paul Sander, Salvatore Fadda, Angélica Karagiannopoulou, Evely Boruchovitch, Douglas F Kauffman

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jesús de la FuenteSchool Education and Psychology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
José Manuel Martínez-VicenteSchool of Psychology, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
Flavia H SantosSchool of Psychology, University College of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul SanderSchool of Psychology, Tesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Salvatore FaddaUnit of Prevention of Stress, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Angélica KaragiannopoulouDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, University Research Centre of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Evely BoruchovitchSchool of Education, UNICAMP State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Douglas F KauffmanSchool of Clinical Medicine, Medical University of the Americas-Nevis, Devens, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory (1986) influenced the development of several complementary models of the construct of Self-Regulation. Building on the foundation of Self-Determination Theory, SDT (2000), and Zimmerman's Self-Regulation Theory, SR (2001), with their assumptions, contributions, goddesses, and limitations, we come to the Self- vs. External Regulatory Theory, SR-ER (2021). Finally, we integrate recent evidence demonstrating the explanatory adequacy of the SR vs. ER model for different psychological constructions in different settings related to education, health, clinical practice and social work. Complementary, a new theoretical and empirical research agenda is presented, to continue testing the adequacy of SR vs. ER assumptions, and to better understand the behavioral variability of the different constructs studied.

Indexed as

Albert Banduraself-determinationself-regulationself- vs. external regulationsocial cognitive theory

Identifiers

PMID35910968
PMCPMC9336543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.