Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Rationale, Design, and Methods for

Elizabeth Rink, Paula Firemoon, Michael Anastario, Olivia Johnson, Ramey GrowingThunder, Adriann Ricker, Malory Peterson, Julie Baldwin

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diné (Navajo) Traditional Knowledge Holders' Perspective of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth RinkDepartment of Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Paula FiremoonFort Peck Community College, Poplar, MT, United States.
Michael AnastarioAHC5, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Olivia JohnsonFort Peck Community College, Poplar, MT, United States.
Ramey GrowingThunderLanguage and Culture Department, Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes, Poplar, MT, United States.
Adriann RickerSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Malory PetersonDepartment of Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Julie BaldwinCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.

Funding

We are here now - a multi-level, multi-component sexual and reproductive health intervention for American Indian youthR01MD012761 · NIMHD · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI BALDWIN, JULIE A., RINK, ELIZABETH LYNNE · 2018 to 2025
$6.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD012761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American Indian (AI) youth in the United States experience disproportionate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) disparities relative to their non-Indigenous, white counterparts, including increased rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), earlier sexual debut, increased rates of teen birth, and reduced access to SRH services. Past research shows that to improve SRH outcomes for AI youth in reservation communities, interventions must address complex factors and multiple levels of community that influence sexual risk behaviors. Here, we describe development of a multi-level, multi-component randomized controlled trial (RCT) to intervene upon SRH outcomes in a Northern Plains American Indian reservation community. Our intervention is rooted in a community based participatory research framework and is evaluated with a stepped wedge design that integrates 5 reservation high schools into a 5-year, cluster-randomized RCT. Ecological Systems Theory was used to design the intervention that includes (1) an individual level component of culturally specific SRH curriculum in school, (2) a parental component of education to improve parent-child communication about SRH and healthy relationships, (3) a community component of cultural mentorship, and (4) a systems-level component to improve delivery of SRH services from reservation healthcare agencies. In this article we present the rationale and details of our research design, instrumentation, data collection protocol, analytical methods, and community participation in the intervention. Our intervention builds upon existing community strengths and integrates traditional Indigenous knowledge and values with current public health knowledge to reduce SRH disparities.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorUnited StatesAmerican Indiancommunity based participatory researchcultureecological systems theorysexual health educationsexually transmitted infectionsstepped wedge designteen pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35910931
PMCPMC9326233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.