Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910902›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2022

Effectiveness of Early Warning Scores for Early Severity Assessment in Outpatient Emergency Care: A Systematic Review.

Amaya Burgos-Esteban, Vicente Gea-Caballero, Patricia Marín-Maicas, Azucena Santillán-García, María de Valvanera Cordón-Hurtado, Elena Marqués-Sule, Marta Giménez-Luzuriaga, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Juan Luis Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jorge García-Criado and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic accuracy of early warning system scores in the prehospital setting.Journal of paramedic practice : the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amaya Burgos-EstebanGovernment of La Rioja, Rioja Health Service Servicio Riojano de Salud, La Rioja, Spain.
Vicente Gea-CaballeroPatient Blood Management Research Group, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia Marín-MaicasCommunity Health and Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Valencian International University, Valencia, Spain.
Azucena Santillán-GarcíaCommunity Health and Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Valencian International University, Valencia, Spain.
María de Valvanera Cordón-HurtadoGovernment of La Rioja, Rioja Health Service Servicio Riojano de Salud, La Rioja, Spain.
Elena Marqués-SuleDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Marta Giménez-LuzuriagaGovernment of La Rioja, Rioja Health Service Servicio Riojano de Salud, La Rioja, Spain.
Raúl Juárez-VelaDepartment of Nursing, Research Group in Care Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
Juan Luis Sanchez-GonzalezDepartment in Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Jorge García-CriadoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Iván Santolalla-ArnedoDepartment of Nursing, Research Group in Care Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Patient assessment and possible deterioration prediction are a healthcare priority. Increasing demand for outpatient emergency care services requires the implementation of simple, quick, and effective systems of patient evaluation and stratification. The purpose of this review is to identify the most effective Early Warning Score (EWS) for the early detection of the risk of complications when screening emergency outpatients for a potentially serious condition. Materials and Methods: Systematic review of the bibliography made in 2022. Scientific articles in Spanish and English were collected from the databases and search engines of Pubmed, Cochrane, and Dialnet, which were published between 2017 and 2021 about EWSs and their capacity to predict complications. Results: For analysis eleven articles were selected. Eight dealt with the application of different early warning scores in outpatient situations, concluding that all the scoring systems they studied were applicable. Three evaluated the predictive ability of various scoring systems and found no significant differences in their results. The eight articles evaluated the suitability of NEWS/NEWS2 to outpatient conditions and concluded it was the most suitable in pre-hospital emergency settings. Conclusions: The early warning scores that were studied can be applied at the pre-hospital level, as they can predict patient mortality in the short term (24 or 48 h) and support clinical patient evaluation and medical decision making. Among them, NEWS2 is the most suitable for screening potentially deteriorating medical emergency outpatients.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScoreEmergency Medical ServicesAmbulatory CareHumansOutpatientsemergency careEmergency Medical Service (EMS)emergency medicinemedicinescale

Identifiers

PMID35910902
PMCPMC9330632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.