Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910644›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples.

Coralie Bouchiat, Christophe Ginevra, Yvonne Benito, Tiphaine Gaillard, Hélène Salord, Olivier Dauwalder, Frédéric Laurent, François Vandenesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cardiogenic brain abscesses in children: the recurrence paradox in a 24-year institutional experience with 571.9 person-years of follow-up.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Nationwide multicentre study of Nanopore long-read sequencing for 16S rRNA-species identification.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Coralie BouchiatLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Christophe GinevraCentre National de Référence des Légionelles, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Yvonne BenitoLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Tiphaine GaillardLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hélène SalordLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Olivier DauwalderLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Frédéric LaurentLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
François VandeneschLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While 16S rRNA PCR-Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach, using both partial and full-length amplification of the gene, and to explore its feasibility and suitability as a routine diagnostic tool for bacterial infections in a clinical laboratory. Thirty-one culture-negative clinical samples from mono- and polymicrobial infections based on Sanger-sequencing results were sequenced on MinION using both the in-house partial amplification and the Nanopore dedicated kit for the full-length amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Contamination, background noise definition, bacterial identification, and time-effectiveness issues were addressed. Cost optimization was also investigated with the miniaturized version of the flow cell (Flongle). The partial 16S approach had a greater sensitivity compared to the full-length kit that detected bacterial DNA in only 24/31 (77.4%) samples. Setting a threshold of 1% of total reads overcame the background noise issue and eased the interpretation of clinical samples. Results were obtained within 1 day, discriminated polymicrobial samples, and gave accurate bacterial identifications compared to Sanger-based results. We also found that multiplexing and using Flongle flow cells was a cost-effective option. The results confirm that Nanopore technology is user-friendly as well as cost- and time-effective. They also indicate that 16S rRNA targeted metagenomics is a suitable approach to be implemented for the routine diagnosis of culture-negative samples in clinical laboratories.

Indexed as

16S rRNAbacterial infectionsmetagenomicsmolecular diagnosisNanopore sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35910644
PMCPMC9329087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.