Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910628›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

The efficiency of Nextera XT tagmentation depends on G and C bases in the binding motif leading to uneven coverage in bacterial species with low and neutral GC-content.

Bo Segerman, Ásgeir Ástvaldsson, Linda Mustafa, Joakim Skarin, Hanna Skarin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification of a core set ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fast and accurateMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo SegermanDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Ásgeir ÁstvaldssonDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Linda MustafaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joakim SkarinDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanna SkarinDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish Veterinary Agency · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming the new standard for bacterial high-resolution typing and the performance of laboratories is being evaluated in interlaboratory comparisons. The use of the Illumina Nextera XT library preparation kit has been found to be associated with poorer performance due to a GC-content-dependent coverage bias. The bias is especially strong when sequencing low GC-content species. Here, we have made an in-depth analysis of the Nextera XT coverage bias problem using data from a proficiency test of the low GC-content species

Indexed as

bacterialCampylobactercoverageGCgenomeNextera XTuneven

Identifiers

PMID35910628
PMCPMC9330563
OpenAlexW4285389940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.