Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910606›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Coronavirus and Pregnancy: The Challenges of the 21

Sumaiya Adam, Carmen Pheiffer, Stephanie Dias, Tsakane Hlongwane, Valerie Vannevel, Priya Soma-Pillay, Fareed Abdullah

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sumaiya AdamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Carmen PheifferDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Stephanie DiasBiomedical Research and Innovation Platform, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tsakane HlongwaneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Valerie VannevelResearch Centre for Maternal, Fetal, Newborn and Child Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Priya Soma-PillayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Fareed AbdullahOffice of AIDS and TB Research, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
University of Pretoria · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many advances in medicine we are still faced with emerging pathogens. Pregnant women have been disproportionately affected by previous coronavirus outbreaks. The COVID-19 pandemic has not affected pregnant women as greatly as SARS-CoV and MERS, but has posed other challenges such as the need for quarantine and isolation, limited access to antenatal care, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), vaccine hesitancy and inequities in vaccine access and therapeutics between rich countries and the global south. This review will describe the impact of the significant coronaviruses on pregnancy, with special focus on the challenges being encountered by the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic.

Indexed as

coronavirushealth systemsMERSpregnancySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35910606
PMCPMC9326040
OpenAlexW4285084854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.