Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910537›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2022

Accurate Computational Prediction of Core-Electron Binding Energies in Carbon-Based Materials: A Machine-Learning Model Combining Density-Functional Theory and

Dorothea Golze, Markus Hirvensalo, Patricia Hernández-León, Anja Aarva, Jarkko Etula, Toma Susi, Patrick Rinke, Tomi Laurila, Miguel A Caro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Accelerating Core-LevelJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  9. Benchmark ofJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dorothea GolzeFaculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2196-9350
Markus HirvensaloDepartment of Applied Physics, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Patricia Hernández-LeónDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3402-2553
Anja AarvaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0207-3145
Jarkko EtulaDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6930-1165
Toma SusiUniversity of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-573X
Patrick RinkeDepartment of Applied Physics, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-723X
Tomi LaurilaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-8764
Miguel A CaroDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9304-4261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a quantitatively accurate machine-learning (ML) model for the computational prediction of core-electron binding energies, from which X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra can be readily obtained. Our model combines density functional theory (DFT) with

Identifiers

PMID35910537
PMCPMC9330771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.