Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910533›Full record

ReviewCurrent pulmonology reports2022

Why Cell-Free DNA Can Be a "Game Changer" for Lung Allograft Monitoring for Rejection and Infection.

J P Rosenheck, B C Keller, G Fehringer, Z P Demko, S M Bohrade, D J Ross

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pulmonology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Hospitable Home? Cell-Free DNA and the Inflammatory Milieu in Lung Transplant Candidates.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Molecular monitoring of lung allograft health: is it ready for routine clinical use?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J P RosenheckDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
B C KellerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2997-6712
G FehringerMedical Affairs in Organ Health, Natera, Inc., San Carlos, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0929-1698
Z P DemkoMedical Affairs in Organ Health, Natera, Inc., San Carlos, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8796-2381
S M BohradeMedical Affairs in Organ Health, Natera, Inc., San Carlos, USA.
D J RossMedical Affairs in Organ Health, Natera, Inc., San Carlos, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9343-9260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Although there has been improvement in short-term clinical outcomes for patients following lung transplant (LT), advances have not translated into longer-term allograft survival. Furthermore, invasive biopsies are still standard of practice for monitoring LT recipients for allograft injury. We review the relevant literature supporting the role of using plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a non-invasive biomarker for LT allograft injury surveillance and discuss future research directions. Recent Findings: Accumulating data has demonstrated that dd-cfDNA is associated with molecular and cellular injury due to acute (cellular and antibody-mediated) rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and relevant infectious pathogens. Strong performance in distinguishing rejection and allograft injury from stable patients has set the stage for clinical trials to assess dd-cfDNA utility for surveillance of LT patients. Research investigating the potential role of dd-cfDNA methylation signatures to map injured tissue and cell-free DNA in detecting allograft injury-related pathogens is ongoing. Summary: There is an amassed breadth of clinical data to support a role for dd-cfDNA in monitoring rejection and other forms of allograft injury. Rigorously designed, robust clinical trials that encompass the diversity in patient demographics are paramount to furthering our understanding and adoption of plasma dd-cfDNA for surveillance of lung allograft health.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCell-free DNADonor-derived cell-free DNALung transplantOrgan rejection

Identifiers

PMID35910533
PMCPMC9315332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.