ReviewCurrent pulmonology reports2022
Why Cell-Free DNA Can Be a "Game Changer" for Lung Allograft Monitoring for Rejection and Infection.
Review in Current pulmonology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid donor-specific single nucleotide variation detection by nanopore sequencing of ex vivo lung perfusate.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Surveillance Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Allows for the Safe Reduction in Protocol Transbronchial Biopsies After Lung Transplantation.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Detection of lung allograft injury through a comprehensive multidisciplinary analysis of donor-derived cell-free DNA in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage: a real-world single center experience.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- A Hospitable Home? Cell-Free DNA and the Inflammatory Milieu in Lung Transplant Candidates.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Molecular monitoring of lung allograft health: is it ready for routine clinical use?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Review
- All That Glitters in cfDNA Analysis Is Not Gold or Its Utility Is Completely Established Due to Graft Damage: A Critical Review in the Field of Transplantation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Single center study investigating the clinical association of donor-derived cell-free DNA with acute outcomes in lung transplantation.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Article
- Donor-derived cell-free DNA as a diagnostic tool in transplantation.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Although there has been improvement in short-term clinical outcomes for patients following lung transplant (LT), advances have not translated into longer-term allograft survival. Furthermore, invasive biopsies are still standard of practice for monitoring LT recipients for allograft injury. We review the relevant literature supporting the role of using plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a non-invasive biomarker for LT allograft injury surveillance and discuss future research directions. Recent Findings: Accumulating data has demonstrated that dd-cfDNA is associated with molecular and cellular injury due to acute (cellular and antibody-mediated) rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and relevant infectious pathogens. Strong performance in distinguishing rejection and allograft injury from stable patients has set the stage for clinical trials to assess dd-cfDNA utility for surveillance of LT patients. Research investigating the potential role of dd-cfDNA methylation signatures to map injured tissue and cell-free DNA in detecting allograft injury-related pathogens is ongoing. Summary: There is an amassed breadth of clinical data to support a role for dd-cfDNA in monitoring rejection and other forms of allograft injury. Rigorously designed, robust clinical trials that encompass the diversity in patient demographics are paramount to furthering our understanding and adoption of plasma dd-cfDNA for surveillance of lung allograft health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.