Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910442›Full record

ReviewPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2022

Recent trends in root phenomics of plant systems with available methods- discrepancies and consonances.

Mohammad Urfan, Shubham Sharma, Haroon Rashid Hakla, Prakriti Rajput, Sonali Andotra, Praveen K Lehana, Renu Bhardwaj, M Suhail Khan, Ranjan Das, Sunil Kumar and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Crops and rising atmospheric COPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammad UrfanPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Shubham SharmaPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Haroon Rashid HaklaPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Prakriti RajputPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Sonali AndotraPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Praveen K LehanaDepartment of Physics, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Renu BhardwajDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, 143001 India.
M Suhail KhanUSBT, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka, 110 078 New Delhi India.
Ranjan DasDepartment of Crop Physiology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, 785013 India.
Sunil KumarDepartment of Statistics, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.
Sikander PalPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180006 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-466X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenotyping of plant roots is a challenging task and poses a major lacuna in plant root research. Roots rhizospheric zone is affected by several environmental cues among which salinity, drought, heavy metal and soil pH are key players. Among biological factors, fungal, nematode and bacterial interactions with roots are vital for improving nutrient uptake efficiency in plants. The subterranean nature of a plant root and the limited number of approaches for root phenotyping offers a great challenge to the plant breeders to select a desirable root trait under different stress conditions. Identification of key root traits can provide a basic understanding for generating crop plants with enhanced ability to withstand various biotic or abiotic stresses. For instance, crops with improved soil exploration potential, phosphate uptake efficiency, water use efficiency and others. Laboratory methods such as hydroponics, rhizotron, rhizoslide and luminescence observatory for roots do not provide precise and desired root quantification attributes. Though 3D imaging by X-ray computed tomography (X-ray-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging techniques are complex, however, it provides the most applicable and practically relevant data for quantifying root system architecture traits. This review outlines the current developments in root studies including recent approaches viz. X-ray-CT, MRI, thermal infrared imaging and minirhizotron. Although root phenotyping is a laborious procedure, it offers multiple advantages by removing discrepancies and providing the actual practical significance of plant roots for breeding programs.

Indexed as

Non-invasivePhenotypingPlant rootsRhizotronsRoot system architecture

Identifiers

PMID35910442
PMCPMC9334470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.