Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910379›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Preclinical Evaluation of Fingolimod in Rodent Models of Stroke With Age or Atherosclerosis as Comorbidities.

Andrea C Diaz Diaz, Kyle Malone, Jennifer A Shearer, Anne C Moore, Christian Waeber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea C Diaz DiazSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Kyle MaloneSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Jennifer A ShearerSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Anne C MooreDepartment of Pharmacology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Christian WaeberDepartment of Pharmacology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical data indicate that fingolimod improves outcome post-ischaemia. This study used a rigorous study design in normal male C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice and in mice with common stroke comorbidities to further evaluate the translational potential of fingolimod. Stroke was induced via middle cerebral artery electrocoagulation in 8-9-week old mice (young mice), 18 month old mice (aged mice), and in high-fat diet-fed 22-week old ApoE-/- mice (hyperlipidaemic mice). Recovery was evaluated using motor behavioural tests 3 and 7 days after stroke. Tissue damage was evaluated at 7 days. A lower dose of fingolimod, 0.5 mg/kg, but not 1 mg/kg, increased lesion size but decreased ipsilateral brain atrophy in younger mice, without an effect on behavioural outcomes. Fingolimod-treated aged mice showed a significant improvement over saline-treated mice in the foot fault test at 7 days. Fingolimod-treated hyperlipidaemic mice showed a decreased infarct size but no difference in behavioural performance. Increasing fingolimod treatment time to 10 days showed no benefit in young mice. Pooled data showed that fingolimod improved performance in the foot fault test. Flow cytometry studies showed that fingolimod had marked effects on T cell frequencies in various tissues. The results show that the effects of fingolimod in stroke are less robust than the existing literature might indicate and may depend on the inflammatory status of the animals.

Indexed as

comorbiditiesFTY720immunosuppressionischemic strokesphingosine 1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID35910379
PMCPMC9326401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.