ArticleGastroenterology report2022
Multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography of the pancreas: measurement reproducibility and variance among healthy volunteers.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and evaluation of a predictive model based on multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography for high-risk esophagogastric varices in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Association between tomoelastography and histological grade and clinical characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Added value of multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography in predicting pathological grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic pancreatitis often have irreversible pancreatic insufficiency before a clinical diagnosis. Pancreatic cancer is a fatal malignant tumor in the advanced stages. Patients having high risk of pancreatic diseases must be screened early to obtain better outcomes using new imaging modalities. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of tomoelastography measurements for assessing pancreatic stiffness and fluidity and the variance among healthy volunteers. Methods: Forty-seven healthy volunteers were prospectively enrolled and underwent two tomoelastography examinations at a mean interval of 7 days. Two radiologists blindly and independently measured the pancreatic stiffness and fluidity at the first examination to determine the reproducibility between readers. One radiologist measured the adjacent pancreatic slice at the first examination to determine the reproducibility among slices and measured the pancreas at the second examination to determine short-term repeatability. The stiffness and fluidity of the pancreatic head, body, and tail were compared to determine anatomical differences. The pancreatic stiffness and fluidity were compared based on sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Results: Bland-Altman analyses (all Conclusion: Tomoelastography is a promising and reproducible tool for assessing pancreatic stiffness and fluidity in healthy volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.