ArticleACS omega2022
Preparation and Performance Investigation of Optimized Cement-Based Sealing Materials Based on the Response Surface Methodology.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research and Application of the Deviation Reduction Mechanism in Stratified Cutting Drilling of Soft-Fragmented Coal Seams.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Research on the Performance of Cement-Based Composite Borehole Sealing Material Based on Orthogonal Test.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Research Progress and Discussion on Modified Cement-Based Borehole Sealing Materials for Mining.ACS omega · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new cement-based sealing material, which used Portland cement (PC) as a raw material and supplemented several gel components, such as accelerant, alkali activator, suspension agent, expansion agent, reinforcing agent, was prepared in this work. The effects of these components on the fluidity, setting time, and expansion rate of these sealing materials were investigated by an orthogonal test. The results show that the water-cement ratio and the reinforcing agent content, the accelerant content and the water-cement ratio, and the expansion agent content and the accelerant content are the most important influencing factors on fluidity, setting time, and expansion rate, respectively. In addition, the regression models and response surfaces of the factors were established using a multiple linear regression method. By this means, the influences of the two main factors on each performance of this sealing material were accurately and intuitively reflected for obtaining the optimal value in the optimization area. The results indicate that the sealing materials possess the best performances when the water-cement ratio is 1.1, the accelerant content is 50%, the expansion agent content is 0.1%, and the reinforcing agent content is 3%, which is corresponding to a fluidity of 360-380 mm, an initial (final) setting time of 60 (80)-80 (100) min, and an expansion rate of 2-12%. Furthermore, the microstructures of the optimized sealing material also reveal that the main hydration products of PC are transformed from layered Ca(OH)
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.