ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Spectrum of BRAF Aberrations and Its Potential Clinical Implications: Insights From Integrative Pan-Cancer Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Encorafenib plus binimetinib for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer in Japan: final analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Trial
- Article
- MTAP Deletion in Oncogenesis: A Synthetic Lethality Scenario.Cancer research · 2026Review
- ONCOPLEX: an oncology-inspired hypergraph model integrating diverse biological knowledge for cancer driver gene prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Landscape of BRAF transcript variants in human cancer.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- TargetingBiotechnologia · 2025Article
- Emerging Tumor-Agnostic Molecular Targets.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2024Review
- Exploring immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients withTranslational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Article
- From genomic spectrum of NTRK genes to adverse effects of its inhibitors, a comprehensive genome-based and real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Navigating the ERK1/2 MAPK Cascade.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- A Combination of Conformation-Specific RAF Inhibitors Overcome Drug Resistance Brought about by RAF Overexpression.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Molecular mechanism and clinical outcome of non-small cell lung cancer patients with high BRAF expression.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- Tumor-Type Agnostic, Targeted Therapies: BRAF Inhibitors Join the Group.Acta medica academica · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (BRAF) is frequently altered in multiple cancer types, and BRAF V600 mutations act as a prime target for precision therapy. Although emerging evidence has investigated the role of BRAF, the comprehensive profiling of BRAF expression, alteration and clinical implications across various cancer types has not been reported. In this study, we used the TCGA dataset, covering 10,967 tumor samples across 32 cancer types, to analyze BRAF abnormal expression, DNA methylation, alterations (mutations and amplification/deletion), and their associations with patient survival. The results showed that BRAF expression, alteration frequency, mutation site distribution, and DNA methylation patterns varied tremendously among different cancer types. The expression of BRAF was found higher in PCPG and CHOL, and lower in TGCT and UCS compared to normal tissues. In terms of pathological stages, BRAF expression was significantly differentially expressed in COAD, KIRC, LUSC, and OV. The methylation levels of BRAF were significantly lower in LUSC, HNSC, and UCEC compared to normal tissue. The expression of BRAF and downstream gene (ETS2) was negatively correlated with methylation levels in various cancers. The overall somatic mutation frequency of BRAF was 7.7% for all cancer samples. Most fusion transcripts were found in THCA and SKCM with distinct fusion patterns. The majority of BRAF mutations were oncogenic and mainly distributed in the Pkinase_Tyr domain of THCA, SKCM, COADREAD, and LUAD. The BRAF mutations were divided into five levels according to the clinical targeted therapy implication. The results showed level 1 was mainly distributed in SKCM, COADREAD, and LUAD, while level 3B in THCA. The overall BRAF CNV frequency was about 42.7%, most of which was gain (75.9%), common in GBM, TGCT, and KIRP. In addition, the forest plot showed that increased BRAF expression was associated with poor patient overall survival in LIHC, OV, and UCEC. Taken together, this study provided a novel insight into the full alteration spectrum of BRAF and its implications for treatment and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.