Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35910024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Spectrum of BRAF Aberrations and Its Potential Clinical Implications: Insights From Integrative Pan-Cancer Analysis.

Qiaoli Yi, Jinwu Peng, Zhijie Xu, Qiuju Liang, Yuan Cai, Bi Peng, Qingchun He, Yuanliang Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TargetingBiotechnologia · 2025
    Article
  7. Emerging Tumor-Agnostic Molecular Targets.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. International journal of breast cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaoli YiDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jinwu PengDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhijie XuDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qiuju LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuan CaiDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Bi PengDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qingchun HeDepartment of Emergency, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuanliang YanDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiangya Hospital Central South University · CNCentral South University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Changde · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (BRAF) is frequently altered in multiple cancer types, and BRAF V600 mutations act as a prime target for precision therapy. Although emerging evidence has investigated the role of BRAF, the comprehensive profiling of BRAF expression, alteration and clinical implications across various cancer types has not been reported. In this study, we used the TCGA dataset, covering 10,967 tumor samples across 32 cancer types, to analyze BRAF abnormal expression, DNA methylation, alterations (mutations and amplification/deletion), and their associations with patient survival. The results showed that BRAF expression, alteration frequency, mutation site distribution, and DNA methylation patterns varied tremendously among different cancer types. The expression of BRAF was found higher in PCPG and CHOL, and lower in TGCT and UCS compared to normal tissues. In terms of pathological stages, BRAF expression was significantly differentially expressed in COAD, KIRC, LUSC, and OV. The methylation levels of BRAF were significantly lower in LUSC, HNSC, and UCEC compared to normal tissue. The expression of BRAF and downstream gene (ETS2) was negatively correlated with methylation levels in various cancers. The overall somatic mutation frequency of BRAF was 7.7% for all cancer samples. Most fusion transcripts were found in THCA and SKCM with distinct fusion patterns. The majority of BRAF mutations were oncogenic and mainly distributed in the Pkinase_Tyr domain of THCA, SKCM, COADREAD, and LUAD. The BRAF mutations were divided into five levels according to the clinical targeted therapy implication. The results showed level 1 was mainly distributed in SKCM, COADREAD, and LUAD, while level 3B in THCA. The overall BRAF CNV frequency was about 42.7%, most of which was gain (75.9%), common in GBM, TGCT, and KIRP. In addition, the forest plot showed that increased BRAF expression was associated with poor patient overall survival in LIHC, OV, and UCEC. Taken together, this study provided a novel insight into the full alteration spectrum of BRAF and its implications for treatment and prognosis.

Indexed as

alterationBRAFgene fusionpan-cancerprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35910024
PMCPMC9329936
OpenAlexW4285386299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.