Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909986›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2022

Computational Structural and Functional Analyses of ORF10 in Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 Variants to Understand Evolutionary Dynamics.

Seema Mishra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seema MishraDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-7899
University of Hyderabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In an effort to combat SARS-CoV-2 through multi-subunit vaccine design, during studies using whole genome and immunome, ORF10, located at the 3' end of the genome, displayed unique features. It showed no homology to any known protein in other organisms, including SARS-CoV. It was observed that its nucleotide sequence is 100% identical in the SARS-CoV-2 genomes sourced worldwide, even in the recent-most VoCs and VoIs of B.1.1.529 (Omicron), B.1.617 (Delta), B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), and P.1 (Gamma) lineages, implicating its constant nature throughout the evolution of deadly variants. Aim: The structure and function of SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 and the role it may play in the viral evolution is yet to be understood clearly. The aim of this study is to predict its structure, function, and understand evolutionary dynamics on the basis of mutations and likely heightened immune responses in the immunopathogenesis of this deadly virus. Methods: Sequence analysis, ab-initio structure modeling and an understanding of the impact of likely substitutions in key regions of protein was carried out. Analyses of viral T cell epitopes and primary anchor residue mutations was done to understand the role it may play in the evolution as a molecule with likely enhanced immune response and consequent immunopathogenesis. Results: Few amino acid substitution mutations are observed, most probably due to the ribosomal frameshifting, and these mutations may not be detrimental to its functioning. As ORF10 is observed to be an expressed protein, ab-initio structure modeling shows that it comprises mainly an α-helical region and maybe an ER-targeted membrane mini-protein. Analyzing the whole proteome, it is observed that ORF10 presents amongst the highest number of likely promiscuous and immunogenic CTL epitopes, specifically 11 out of 30 promiscuous ones and 9 out of these 11, immunogenic CTL epitopes. Reactive T cells to these epitopes have been uncovered in independent studies. Majority of these epitopes are located on the α-helix region of its structure, and the substitution mutations of primary anchor residues in these epitopes do not affect immunogenicity. Its conserved nucleotide sequence throughout the evolution and diversification of virus into several variants is a puzzle yet to be solved. Conclusions: On the basis of its sequence, structure, and epitope mapping, it is concluded that it may function like those mini-proteins used to boost immune responses in medical applications. Due to the complete nucleotide sequence conservation even a few years after SARS-CoV-2 genome was first sequenced, it poses a unique puzzle to be solved, in view of the evolutionary dynamics of variants emerging in the populations worldwide.

Indexed as

ab initio structural modelCTL epitopesgenomicsimmunoinformaticsminiproteinsmutations and evolutionORF10SARS-CoV-2structure-function

Identifiers

PMID35909986
PMCPMC9336178
OpenAlexW4285122246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.