Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909874›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Weighted Bayesian Belief Network: A Computational Intelligence Approach for Predictive Modeling in Clinical Datasets.

Shweta Kharya, Edeh Michael Onyema, Aasim Zafar, Mohd Anas Wajid, Rockson Kwasi Afriyie, Tripti Swarnkar, Sunita Soni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shweta KharyaBhilai Institute of Technology, Durg 491001, India.
Edeh Michael OnyemaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Coal City University, Enugu, Nigeria.
Aasim ZafarDepartment of Computer Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1331-014X
Mohd Anas WajidDepartment of Computer Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-1636
Rockson Kwasi AfriyieDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Dr Hilla Limann Technical University, WA, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6247-5285
Tripti SwarnkarS'O'A Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar 751001, India.
Sunita SoniBhilai Institute of Technology, Durg, 491001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are growing concerns about the mortality due to Breast cancer many of which often result from delayed detection and treatment. So an effective computational approach is needed to develop a predictive model which will help patients and physicians to manage the situation timely. This study presented a Weighted Bayesian Belief Network (WBBN) modeling for breast cancer prediction using the UCI breast cancer dataset. New automated ranking method was used to assign proper weights to attribute value pair based on their impact on causing the disease. Association between attributes was generated using weighted association rule mining between two attributes, multiattributes, and with class labels to generate rules. Weighted Bayesian confidence and weighted Bayesian lift measures were used to produce strong rules to build the model. To build WBBN, the Open Markov tool was used for structure and parametric learning using generated strong rules. The model was trained using 70% records and tested on 30% records with a threshold value of minimum support = 36% and confidence = 70% which produced results with an accuracy of 97.18%. Experimental results show that WBBN achieved better results in most cases compared to other predictive models. The study would contribute to the fight against breast cancer and the quality of treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID35909874
PMCPMC9328988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.