Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909823›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Prospects and Challenges of Using Machine Learning for Academic Forecasting.

Edeh Michael Onyema, Khalid K Almuzaini, Fergus Uchenna Onu, Devvret Verma, Ugboaja Samuel Gregory, Monika Puttaramaiah, Rockson Kwasi Afriyie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Edeh Michael OnyemaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Coal City University, Enugu, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4067-3256
Khalid K AlmuzainiNational Center for Cybersecurity Technologies (C4C), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4458-3730
Fergus Uchenna OnuDepartment of Computer Science, Ebonyi State University, Abakiliki, Nigeria.
Devvret VermaDepartment of Biotechnology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-2009
Ugboaja Samuel GregoryDepartment of Computer Science, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia, Nigeria.
Monika PuttaramaiahDepartment of Machine Learning, BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-6034
Rockson Kwasi AfriyieDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University, WA, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6247-5285
Ebonyi State University · NGGraphic Era University · INKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SALead City University · NGMichael Okpara University of Agriculture · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examines the prospects and challenges of machine learning (ML) applications in academic forecasting. Predicting academic activities through machine learning algorithms presents an enhanced means to accurately forecast academic events, including the academic performances and the learning style of students. The use of machine learning algorithms such as K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, bagging, artificial neural network (ANN), and Bayesian neural network (BNN) has potentials that are currently being applied in the education sector to predict future events. Many gaps in the traditional forecasting techniques have greatly been bridged by the use of artificial intelligence-based machine learning algorithms thereby aiding timely decision-making by education stakeholders. ML algorithms are deployed by educational institutions to predict students' learning behaviours and academic achievements, thereby giving them the opportunity to detect at-risk students early and then develop strategies to help them overcome their weaknesses. However, despite the benefits associated with the ML approach, there exist some limitations that could affect its correctness or deployment in forecasting academic events, e.g., proneness to errors, data acquisition, and time-consuming issues. Nonetheless, we suggest that machine learning remains one of the promising forecasting technologies with the power to enhance effective academic forecasting that would assist the education industry in planning and making better decisions to enrich the quality of education.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremForecastingHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35909823
PMCPMC9337975
OpenAlexW4283077296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.