Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909789›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Evaluation of Plant Growth-Promoting and Salinity Ameliorating Potential of Halophilic Bacteria Isolated From Saline Soil.

Chintan Kapadia, Nafisa Patel, Ankita Rana, Harihar Vaidya, Saleh Alfarraj, Mohammad Javed Ansari, Abdul Gafur, Peter Poczai, R Z Sayyed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Biofertilizer and Antifungal Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Selection andACS agricultural science & technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Draft genome sequence of3 Biotech · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Chintan KapadiaDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, India.
Nafisa PatelNaran Lala College of Professional and Applied Sciences, Navsari, India.
Ankita RanaNaran Lala College of Professional and Applied Sciences, Navsari, India.
Harihar VaidyaDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, India.
Saleh AlfarrajZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Javed AnsariDepartment of Botany, Hindu College (Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University Bareilly), Moradabad, India.
Abdul GafurSinarmas Forestry Corporate Research and Development, Perawang, Indonesia.
Peter PoczaiFinnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
R Z SayyedDepartment of Entomology, Asian PGPR Society for Sustainable Agriculture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Navsari Agricultural University · ING.S. Science, Arts And Commerce College · INKing Saud University · SAM.J.P. Rohilkhand University · INUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the biotic and abiotic stress affecting the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil, salinity is a major threat that leads to the desertification of cultivable land throughout the world. The existence of diverse and versatile microbial populations inhabiting the nutrient-rich soil and varied soil conditions affects the soil dynamism. A normal soil constitutes 600 million bacteria belonging to about 20,000 species, which is reduced to 1 million with 5,000-8,000 species in stress conditions. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are in symbiotic association with the plant system, which helps in combating the abiotic stress and increases the overall productivity and yield. These microorganisms are actively associated with varied cellular communication processes through quorum sensing and secondary metabolites such as the production of Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), exopolysaccharide (EPS) siderophore, ammonia, ACC deaminase, and solubilization of phosphate. The present study focused on the isolation, identification, and characterization of the microorganisms isolated from the seacoast of Dandi, Navsari. Twelve isolates exhibited PGP traits at a high salt concentration of 15-20%. AD9 isolate identified as

Indexed as

abiotic stressACC deaminaseantioxidant enzymesbiofilmIAAmicrobial diversityPGPRsaline soil

Identifiers

PMID35909789
PMCPMC9335293
OpenAlexW4285589145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.