Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909712›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2022

Issues affecting supply of palliative medicines into community pharmacy: A qualitative study of community pharmacist and pharmaceutical wholesaler/distributor perspectives.

Natasha Campling, Liz Breen, Elizabeth Miller, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Alison Richardson, Michael Bennett, Susan Latter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Challenges to timely access to out-of-hours end-of-life medications: a qualitative study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha CamplingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England, UK.
Liz BreenUniversity of Bradford School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, M27a Richmond Building, Richmond Road, Bradford BD7 1DP, England, UK.
Elizabeth MillerSt Luke's Hospice, Little Common Lane, Sheffield S11 9NE, England, UK.
Jacqueline BirtwistleLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9NL, England, UK.
Alison RichardsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England, UK.
Michael BennettLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9NL, England, UK.
Susan LatterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England, UK.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBSt Christopher's Hospice · GBUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient access to medicines in the community at end-of-life (pertaining to the last year of life) is vital for symptom control. Supply of such medicines is known to be problematic, but despite this, studies have failed to examine the issues affecting community pharmacy access to palliative medicines. Objective: To identify community pharmacists' and pharmaceutical wholesalers'/distributors' views on supply chain processes and challenges in providing access to medicines during the last year of life, to characterise supply in this UK context. Methods: Qualitative design, with telephone interviews analysed using Framework Analysis. Coding frames were developed iteratively with data analysed separately and then triangulated to examine differences in perspectives. Findings: Thirty-two interviews (24 community pharmacists and 8 wholesalers/distributors) were conducted. To ensure appropriate palliative medicines were available despite occasional shortages, community pharmacists worked tirelessly. They navigated a challenging interface with wholesalers/distributors, the Drug Tariff to ensure reimbursement, and multiple systems. IT infrastructures and logistics provided by wholesalers/distributors were often helpful to supply into community pharmacies resulting in same or next day deliveries. However, the inability of manufacturers to predict operational issues or accurately forecast demand led wholesalers/distributors to encounter shortages with manufactured stock levels, reducing timely access to medicines. Conclusions: The study identifies for the first time how palliative medicines supply into community pharmacy, can be improved. A conceptual model was developed, illustrating how influencing factors affect responsiveness and speed of medicines access for patients. Work is required to strengthen this supply chain via effective relationship-building and information-sharing, to prevent patients facing disruptions in access to palliative medicines at end-of-life.

Indexed as

CD, Controlled Drug (controlled substances)Community pharmacyCP, Community PharmacistEnd-of-lifeEoL, End-of-Life (pertaining to the last year of life)FL, Full-line wholesalerGP, General Practitioner (family doctor)I, Independent pharmacyLM, Large multiple pharmacyMedicines accessPalliative care medicinesPharmaceutical wholesalers/distributorsSL, Short-line wholesalerSM, Small multiple pharmacySupplyWD, Wholesaler/distributor

Identifiers

PMID35909712
PMCPMC9335932
OpenAlexW4225833006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.